• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Antitrust Bulletin >EC competition law and intellectual property rights in the new economy
【24h】

EC competition law and intellectual property rights in the new economy

机译：新经济中的欧共体竞争法和知识产权

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The competition policies of the Commission under articles 81 and 82 as well as under the merger control regulation continue to function as a second tier of regulation of the exercise of intellectual property rights in the new economy as in the old. This occurs because in the new economy the commercial strategy of the rightholder occasionally gets caught in the crossfire of the measures used by competition policy to maintain competitive markets. Merger policy has been used to inhibit vertical acquisitions of complementary products and processes on secondary markets that can lead to foreclosure of markets by the tipping process as well as the more traditional acquisitions of competing technologies on primary markets. As with the article 82 type of regulation, the existence of IPRs is regarded as incidental to the market power of the entity being formed. If the actual market power of a firm in one market is reinforced by an IPR, it will be treated as if its intangible property rights are no different than its tangible property rights. The negative effect of this type of curb on innovation or the incentives to innovation is thought to be counterbalanced by the maintenance of access to markets by competitors. At this point in its development, the EC competition authorities have not succumbed to the arguments for creative destruction and fragile monopolies as an excuse for the relaxation of competition concerns about foreclosure of markets.
机译：欧盟委员会根据第81条和第82条以及《合并控制条例》制定的竞争政策继续作为旧经济中新经济中行使知识产权的第二层管理职能。发生这种情况的原因是，在新经济中，权利人的商业策略有时会陷入竞争政策用来维持竞争性市场的措施的交火中。合并政策已被用来禁止在二级市场上垂直收购互补产品和过程，这可能导致通过倾销过程以及更传统的在主要市场上收购竞争技术而导致市场被赎回。与第82条规定一样，知识产权的存在被视为与所形成实体的市场力量有关。如果公司在一个市场中的实际市场力量通过知识产权得到加强，则将其视为无形财产权与有形财产没有区别。人们认为，这种限制措施对创新或创新激励的负面影响可以通过维持竞争者的市场准入来抵消。在发展的这一点上，欧共体竞争管理当局尚未屈服于关于创造性破坏和脆弱的垄断的争论，以此作为放宽竞争对市场丧失抵押品赎回权的担忧的借口。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号