• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Energy >Exploring the characteristics of production-based and consumption-based carbon emissions of major economies: A multiple-dimension comparison
【24h】

Exploring the characteristics of production-based and consumption-based carbon emissions of major economies: A multiple-dimension comparison

机译：探索主要经济体的基于生产和基于消费的碳排放特征：多维比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Addressing climate change requires the efforts of all countries with common but differentiated responsibilities. The mitigation responsibilities one country takes greatly depends on its national emission inventories. As a good complement to the production-based accounting (PBA) principle, consumption based accounting (CBA) principle has been widely concerned. However, few studies focus on emissions equity issues temporally and spatially. In this paper, we explore the characteristics of production based and consumption-based CO2 emissions for 14 major economies through multiple-dimension comparisons to get insight into the emissions equity comparisons among major emitters. In particular, four categories of economies with different dynamic features are divided based on their percentage differences between PBA and CBA emissions. Demographical and economic variables are additionally taken into consideration. The results indicate that France and Russia hold extreme characteristic on evaluating the emission difference between two principles, while China and Chinese Taiwan reveal uniquely increasingly larger gaps between two principle emissions. Besides, the per capita CBA emissions grows more prominently and possesses a more obviously positive correlation with their own per capita GDP which confirms that CBA principle is potentially attractive for estimating national emissions. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译：解决气候变化需要承担共同但有区别责任的所有国家作出努力。一国承担的缓解责任在很大程度上取决于其国家的排放清单。作为对基于生产的会计（PBA）原则的良好补充，基于消耗的会计（CBA）原则已受到广泛关注。但是，很少有研究关注时空上的排放公平问题。在本文中，我们通过多维比较探索了14个主要经济体的基于生产和基于消费的CO2排放特征，以深入了解主要排放国之间的排放公平性比较。特别是，根据PBA和CBA排放量之间的百分比差异，将具有不同动态特征的四类经济体进行了划分。另外还考虑了人口和经济变量。结果表明，法国和俄罗斯在评估两种主要排放量之间的差异时具有极端的特征，而中国和中国台湾地区则发现两种主要排放量之间的差距越来越大。此外，人均CBA排放量增长更为显着，并且与他们自己的人均GDP有着更明显的正相关性，这证明了CBA原理对于估算国家排放量具有潜在的吸引力。 （C）2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Applied Energy》 |2016年第15期|790-799|共10页
  • 作者

    Fan Jing-Li; Hou Yun-Bing; Wang Qian; Wang Ce; Wei Yi-Ming;

  • 作者单位

    China Univ Min & Technol Beijing, Fac Resources & Safety Engn, Beijing 10083, Peoples R China;

    China Univ Min & Technol Beijing, Fac Resources & Safety Engn, Beijing 10083, Peoples R China;

    Beijing Inst Technol, Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China|Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China|Univ Maryland, Dept Geog Sci, College Pk, MD 20742 USA;

    Beijing Inst Technol, Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China|Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China;

    Beijing Inst Technol, Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China|Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Consumption-based accounting; Production-based accounting; CO2 emissions; Climate change; Mitigation responsibility;

    机译：基于消费的核算;基于生产的核算;CO2排放量;气候变化;缓解责任;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号