首页> 外文期刊>Environment and Development Economics >Production-based versus consumption-based emission targets: implications for developing and developed economies
【24h】

Production-based versus consumption-based emission targets: implications for developing and developed economies

机译:基于生产的排放目标与基于消费的排放目标:对发展中和发达经济体的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper evaluates how the marginal abatement cost (MAC) and the efficiency cost of policies will change at the regional and global level if reduction targets are based on consumption-based emissions (CBEs) rather than on production-based emissions (PBEs). Using a CGE model, this paper finds that the MAC of CBEs is in general higher than that of PBEs, mainly due to limited substitution possibilities between energy and non-energy goods in final consumption compared to those in the choice of inputs in production activities under PBEs. Interestingly, when policies such as border carbon adjustments (BCAs) are introduced to reduce CBEs, net importers of emissions are better off, while net exporters of emissions are worse off in this approach compared to the PBEs target. If border tariffs are not allowed, the CBEs target turns out to be worse both for net importers and exporters of emissions.
机译:如果减少目标是基于消费的排放量(CBE)而不是基于生产的排放量(PBE),则本文评估了边际减排成本(MAC)和政策效率成本在区域和全球范围内将如何变化。使用CGE模型,本文发现CBE的MAC通常高于PBE的MAC,这主要是由于与最终选择下生产活动中的投入选择相比,最终消费中的能源和非能源产品之间的替代可能性有限PBE。有趣的是,当采用诸如边界碳调整(BCA)之类的政策来减少CBE时,与PBE的目标相比,采用这种方法的排放净进口者的状况要好一些,而排放的净出口者的状况要差得多。如果不允许边境关税,那么对净排放者和排放者来说,CBEs的目标都会变得更糟。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment and Development Economics》 |2014年第5期|585-606|共22页
  • 作者单位

    Analysis and Modeling Division, Environment Canada, 10 Wellington Street, Gatineau, Quebec, K1A 0H3, Canada;

    Centre for International Governance Innovation, Canada;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号