...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Armed Forces & Society >Neutral Is Not Impartial: The Confusing Legacy of Traditional Peace Operations Thinking
【24h】

Neutral Is Not Impartial: The Confusing Legacy of Traditional Peace Operations Thinking

机译：中立不是公正的：传统和平行动思想的混乱传统

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The lesson of Somalia and Bosnia is simple; that it is impossible to use force and be always perceived to be impartial. Yet this is still either not accepted, or used as grounds not to use force. To a considerable extent, this is the product of the traditional trinitarian view of impartiality, particularly its explicit and implicit linkage with neutrality. Where pure trinitarian impartiality has been applied to Grey Area operations, the UN has fallen back on neutrality. Where attempts have been made to stretch the trinity, the tactical-level product has also been neutrality. This is above all because the basic perspective of impartiality in the widening circle of PSO practitioners and thinkers is that it must be defined by the parties to the conflict. And as recent Grey Area operations have shown, that way lie impotence and inactivity.
机译：索马里和波斯尼亚的教训很简单；不可能使用武力，并且总是被认为是公正的。然而，这要么不被接受，要么被用作不使用武力的理由。在很大程度上，这是传统的三位一体的公正观的产物，特别是它与中立性的显性和隐性联系。在将纯三位一体的公正性应用于灰色地区行动的地方，联合国已退守中立。在试图扩大三位一体的地方，战术层面的产物也是中立的。这首先是因为在PSO实践者和思想家不断扩大的圈子中，公正的基本观点是必须由冲突各方来定义。而且，正如最近的“灰区”行动所显示的那样，那就是阳imp和不活跃。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号