首页> 外文期刊>Australian journal of maritime & ocean affairs >The strategic implications of 'sea blindness' in the Australian LNG trade dynamic
【24h】

The strategic implications of 'sea blindness' in the Australian LNG trade dynamic

机译:“海盲”在澳大利亚液化天然气贸易动态中的战略意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this Maritime Century, the notion of sea blindness' is an interesting development. There is a perception that Australia has long experienced a 'sea blindness', where the sense of the sea and surroundings is not generally apparent in Australians [Jones, J. 2013. A Maritime School of Strategic Thought for Australia, vol. 1, Sea Power Centre. Canberra: ACT]. However, reference to 'sea blindness' is not restricted to Australia's circumstance alone. Britain's 'dangerously weak Royal Navy' [Beazley, Kim C. 1989. The Development of Australian Maritime Strategy, Selected Speeches 1985-1989 by the Hon Kim C Beazley, MP, Minister for Defence. Canberra: Directorate of Departmental Publications] and reliance on sea traffic elicited the phrase in 2009 when Britain's policymakers were branded as suffering 'sea blindness' an accusation substantiated in relation to the need for security, vulnerability to interruption of supply, and a weakened naval force structure. A nationwide survey of Seafarers UK in 2011, suggested that the British public had an alarming ignorance of the island's dependence on the sea and that 'sea blindness' was a 'huge problem' [Harvey, N. 2011. "Finding a Cure for Sea Blindness." The Maritime Foundation. Accessed January 16, 2019.]. Yet in 2017 a further opinion poll conducted by the UK Chamber of shipping confirmed that 'seablindness is a myth' [Roberts, J. 2017. "Opinion Poll Confirms 'Seablindness' is a Myth, UK Chamber of Shipping." Accessed January 16, 2019.]. Does 'sea blindness' exist in the Australian circumstance? An intimate appreciation of the Australian LNG trade could provide a publicly visible appreciation of Australia's strategic maritime circumstance in relation to other sovereign interests.
机译:在这个海洋世纪,“海盲”的概念是一个有趣的发展。有一种观点认为,澳大利亚长期以来一直经历着“海盲”,在这种情况下,澳大利亚人通常不了解海洋和周围的环境[Jones,J. 2013。 1,海上力量中心。堪培拉:ACT]。但是,提及“海盲”并不仅限于澳大利亚的情况。英国的“危险软弱的皇家海军” [比兹利,金·C。1989年。《澳大利亚海事战略的发展》,国防部长,国会议员金·比兹利,1985年至1989年致辞全文。堪培拉:部门出版物局局长]和对海上交通的依赖在2009年引起了这样的表述,当时英国的决策者被贴上“海盲”的烙印,在安全性,供应中断方面的脆弱性以及海军力量的削弱等方面都得到了充分的指控。结构体。 2011年对英国海员进行的一项全国调查表明,英国公众对岛上对海洋的依赖一无所知,而“海盲”是一个“巨大问题” [Harvey,N. 2011。失明。”海事基金会。 [2019年1月16日访问。]。然而,在2017年,英国船级社进行的另一次民意测验证实“海盲症是一个神话” [Roberts,J.2017。“民意调查确认英国船级社是“海盲症”是一个神话。 [2019年1月16日访问。]。在澳大利亚情况下是否存在“海盲”现象?对澳大利亚液化天然气贸易的亲密鉴赏可以使公众对澳大利亚与其他主权利益相关的战略海洋情况的鉴赏力得到公开体现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号