• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Australian journal of maritime & ocean affairs >Can authentic assessment find its place in seafarer education and training?
【24h】

Can authentic assessment find its place in seafarer education and training?

机译：真实的评估能否在海员教育和培训中找到自己的位置？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Evidence from past research suggests that decontextualised traditional assessment methods promoted by the STCW Code'95 are failing to address the development of skills considered essential by seafarer employers and leading to overall student disengagement. Authentic assessments conducted in real-world contexts and requiring an integration of competence will assess a seafarer's competence to perform tasks at workplace standards. However, there is absence of research on authentic assessment in seafarer education and training (SET). The assessment methods adopted by maritime education and training (MET) institutes to assess a seafarer's competence is directed by the requirements of the STCW Code. Hence, this paper analyses assessment methods (training ships, in-service experience, simulator, laboratory equipment, practical tests) other than traditional assessments that are recommended by the STCW Code in its effectiveness to implement authentic assessment for SET. The effectiveness of the methods was not only judged on its ability to recreate real-world scenarios but also on the issues of financial costs, task design, and learning effect. This paper concludes to state that authentic assessment can theoretically find its place in SET if the issues highlighted in this paper are addressed. Future research shall provide empirical evidence towards the impact of authentic assessment on student achievement.
机译：以往研究的证据表明，《 STCW规则》 95提倡的脱上下文传统评估方法未能解决海员雇主认为必不可少的技能发展问题，并导致学生全面脱离工作。在真实环境中进行的真实评估并需要能力整合，才能评估海员按照工作场所标准执行任务的能力。但是，在海员教育和培训（SET）中缺乏关于真实评估的研究。海上教育培训机构（MET）所采用的评估海员能力的评估方法受STCW规则的要求指导。因此，本文分析了STCW规则建议的传统评估方法以外的评估方法（培训船，在役经验，模拟器，实验室设备，实际测试），而不是传统评估方法，以有效地实施SET的真实评估。这些方法的有效性不仅取决于其重现现实情况的能力，还取决于财务成本，任务设计和学习效果的问题。本文的结论是，如果解决了本文中强调的问题，那么真实评估就可以在理论上找到SET中的位置。未来的研究应提供关于真实评估对学生成绩影响的经验证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号