...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Australian journal of water resources >Sharing stakeholder knowledge across water management boundaries and interfaces: experiences from Australian and New Zealand 'HELP' basins
【24h】

Sharing stakeholder knowledge across water management boundaries and interfaces: experiences from Australian and New Zealand 'HELP' basins

机译：在水管理边界和界面之间共享利益相关者的知识：澳大利亚和新西兰“ HELP”盆地的经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

As water management issues have grown and become more connected, the need to engage civil society and incorporate a wider range of community knowledge in decision-making is increasingly recognised. This paper discusses experiences of three river basins that are part of the UNESCO-IHP Hydrology for the Environment, Life and Policy programme. In each, water management issues cross different kinds of 'boundaries'. At the Ord River, northwestern Australia, investment in irrigation expansion and social infrastructure is driving the need for more comprehensive water planning and management incorporating a new set of economic, social and ecological values, new knowledge sources, and more collaboration with the neighbouring jurisdiction. In the lower Burdekin, north-eastern Australia, sugar cane irrigators need to reduce their impact on local groundwater, wetlands and adjacent Great Barrier Reef. And at the Motueka River, on New Zealand's South Island, an 11-year Integrated Catchment Management programme sought solutions to the impacts of upstream land use on downstream water quality. While none of the basins physically crosses an international or national boundary, they can all be considered transboundary waters. These examples show that many of the challenges experienced in relation to international transboundary resources are replicated at other scales and in other ways: across internal borders, through institutional confines, across environmental interfaces, between economic sectors and around a range of social norms. Understanding the various boundaries can help identify a more comprehensive and inclusive suite of stakeholders, enabling their interests and knowledge to be incorporated into decision-making. Sharing knowledge across these boundaries is critical to developing the mutual understanding necessary to support better water management and more equitable benefit-sharing from available water resources.
机译：随着水管理问题的增长和联系的日益紧密，人们日益认识到需要使民间社会参与并在决策过程中吸收更广泛的社区知识。本文讨论了作为联合国教科文组织-国际水文计划环境，生命和政策水文学计划一部分的三个流域的经验。在每种情况下，水管理问题跨越不同类型的“边界”。在澳大利亚西北部的奥德河，对灌溉扩建和社会基础设施的投资推动了对更全面水规划和管理的需求，这些规划和管理结合了一套新的经济，社会和生态价值，新的知识来源以及与邻国的更多合作。在澳大利亚东北部的伯德金下游，甘蔗灌溉者需要减少对当地地下水，湿地和邻近的大堡礁的影响。在新西兰南岛的Motueka河上，一项为期11年的综合集水管理计划寻求解决方案，以解决上游土地使用对下游水质的影响。尽管没有一个流域在物理上跨越国际或国家边界，但它们都可以被视为跨界水域。这些例子表明，与国际跨界资源有关的许多挑战以其他规模和其他方式得以重现：跨越内部边界，通过机构限制，跨越环境界面，经济部门之间以及一系列社会规范。理解各个边界可以帮助确定更全面，更具包容性的利益相关者套件，从而使他们的兴趣和知识被纳入决策。在这些边界上共享知识对于建立必要的相互理解至关重要，以支持更好的水管理和从可用水资源中更公平地分享利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号