...
【24h】

Clausewitzless

机译:无子句的

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It's unlikely that the U.S. Air Force will be abolished in anyone's lifetime, whatever Robert Farley may think (AW&ST July 28, p. 50). Former Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Norton Schwartz and attorney Charles Blanchard (AW&ST Aug. 25, p. 50) competently defend the Air Force's operational record and doctrine in their response. But Farley's book, Grounded: The Case for Abolishing the United States Air Force (University Press of Kentucky, 2014), makes a bigger argument: The case for an independent air force is based on the false assertion that airpower can win wars on its own. The book exemplifies a toxic and irrational skepticism toward airpower, and only airpower, that pervades some military thinking.
机译:无论罗伯特·法利(Robert Farley)怎么想,美国空军都不可能在其一生中被废除(AW&ST 7月28日,第50页)。空军前参谋长诺顿·施瓦茨将军和律师查尔斯·布兰查德(AW&ST 8月25日,第50页)为空军的作战记录和原则辩护。但是,法利(Farley)的著作《扎根:取消美国空军的理由》(肯塔基大学出版社,2014年)提出了一个更大的论点:独立空军的理由是基于这样的错误主张,即空中力量可以自己赢得战争。这本书举例说明了对空中力量(只有空中力量)的有毒和非理性的怀疑,这种怀疑笼罩了一些军事思想。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号