...
【24h】

TRUST 'OPEN,' BUT VERIFY

机译:信任“开放”,但可以验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I agree with the majority of the premises in "Open Season" (AW&ST June 27, p. 60). Open architectures are mostly a good thing. Much of my career was as a Software engineer in technologies defined by industry Standards. The standards-driven model usually does deliver better results to customers than a narrowly proprietary approach, but caution is warranted. We must ask: Who owns it? Vendors usually control a standards-based — market. Such technologies are actually proprietary, it's just that consortiums rather than individual companies control them. If the consor-tium consists of for-proflt hardware/ Software vendors, customers may get to enjoy "innovation" that's a better fit for those vendors' marketing objec-tives than for their own needs.
机译:我同意“开放季节”(AW&ST 6月27日,第60页)中的大多数场所。开放式体系结构通常是一件好事。我的大部分职业是作为行业标准定义的技术的软件工程师。与狭proprietary专有的方法相比,标准驱动的模型通常可以为客户带来更好的结果,但是要谨慎行事。我们必须问:谁拥有它?供应商通常控制基于标准的市场。这样的技术实际上是专有的,只是联盟而不是单个公司来控制它们。如果领事馆由专业的硬件/软件供应商组成,则客户可能会享受“创新”,这种创新更适合那些供应商的营销目标,而不是他们自己的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号