...
【24h】

Narrowbodies Battle

机译:窄体战役

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Airbus and Boeing face increasingly tough production decisions as they try to hone aircraft strategies for late next decade, made all the more difficult due to mixed messages from engine makers. Sorting out what to do in the narrow-body arena is likely to prove particularly challenging. The two airframe makers are weighing a bewildering array of dissimilar engine candidates being pushed by their suppliers, ranging from the traditional architecture of CFM International's Leap-X, to Pratt & Whitney's geared turbofan, to Rolls-Royce's open rotor (see p. 39). Moreover, with the introduction of Bombardier's CSeries, there is new competition in the single-aisle realm, even though Airbus and Boeing shrug off the program launch as hardly a threat, since they plan to focus on bigger seat counts (130-250) in their respective 737 and A320 replacement offerings.
机译:空中客车公司和波音公司在尝试制定下一个十年后期的飞机战略时,面临着越来越艰难的生产决策,由于发动机制造商的信息不一,使得飞机制造更加困难。整理窄体领域的活动可能被证明特别具有挑战性。两家飞机制造商正在权衡其供应商所推动的各种引擎选择,这些选择令人困惑,从CFM International的Leap-X的传统架构到普惠的齿轮涡轮风扇,再到罗尔斯·罗伊斯的敞开式转子(请参见第39页)。 。此外,随着庞巴迪C系列飞机的推出,单通道领域也出现了新的竞争,尽管空中客车公司和波音公司认为该计划的推出并不构成威胁,因为他们计划将重点放在更大的座位数(130-250)上。他们各自的737和A320替代产品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号