• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>British Food Journal >Predicting breakfast consumption: A comparison of the theory of planned behaviour and the health action process approach
【24h】

Predicting breakfast consumption: A comparison of the theory of planned behaviour and the health action process approach

机译：预测早餐消费：计划行为理论与健康行动过程方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose - Breakfast consumption is associated with a range of beneficial health outcomes including improved overall diet quality, lower BMI, decreased risk of chronic disease, and improved cognitive function. Although there are many models of health and social behaviour, there is a paucity of research utilising these in breakfast consumption and very few studies that directly compare these models. This study aims to compare the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) and the health action process approach (HAPA) in predicting breakfast consumption. Design/methodology/approach - University students (N = 102; M = 19.5 years) completed a questionnaire measuring demographics, TPB and HAPA motivational variables, and intentions. Behaviour and HAPA volitional variables were measured four weeks later. Findings - Using structural equation modelling, it was found that the TPB model was a superior fit to the data across a range of model indices compared to the HAPA. Both models significantly predicted both intentions and behaviour at follow up; however, the TPB predicted a higher proportion of the variance in breakfast consumption (47.6 per cent) than the HAPA (44.8 per cent). Further, the volitional variables did not mediate the intention-behaviour gap, and the data were not an adequate statistical fit to the model compared to the TPB. Research limitations/implications - The results support the use of the TPB and show that some aspects of the HAPA are useful in predicting breakfast consumption, suggesting that risk perception and self-efficacy be targeted in interventions to increase behaviour. The volitional variables did not appear to mediate breakfast consumption indicating that intention is still the strongest predictor, at least in this behaviour. Originality/value - The current study is the first to compare the TPB and HAPA in predicting breakfast。
机译：目的-早餐消费与一系列有益健康的结果有关，包括改善整体饮食质量，降低BMI，降低慢性病风险和改善认知功能。尽管有许多健康和社会行为模型，但很少有研究将其用于早餐消费中，很少有研究可以直接比较这些模型。这项研究旨在比较计划行为理论（TPB）和健康行动过程方法（HAPA）在预测早餐消费中的作用。设计/方法/方法-大学生（N = 102； M = 19.5岁）完成了一份问卷，以测量人口统计学，TPB和HAPA动机变量以及意图。四周后测量行为和HAPA自愿变量。研究结果-使用结构方程建模，与HAPA相比，TPB模型更适合各种模型指标范围内的数据。两种模型均能显着预测随访的意图和行为。然而，城规会预测，早餐消费差异的比例（47.6％）要比HAPA（44.8％）高。此外，自愿变量没有调解意向-行为差距，与TPB相比，数据对模型的统计拟合度不足。研究的局限性/结果-结果支持TPB的使用，并表明HAPA的某些方面可用于预测早餐的摄入量，这表明风险感知和自我效能感应作为干预措施以增加行为。自愿变量似乎并未介导早餐的消费，这表明意向仍然是最强的预测指标，至少在这种行为方面。创意/价值-本研究是第一个比较TPB和HAPA预测早餐的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号