• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>British journal of industrial Relations >The Influence of Unions on CSR: Is There a Trade-Off Between Employee-Oriented and Non-Employee-Oriented Policies?
【24h】

The Influence of Unions on CSR: Is There a Trade-Off Between Employee-Oriented and Non-Employee-Oriented Policies?

机译：工会对CSR的影响：导向员工和非员工导向的政策之间是否存在权衡？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Strategic managers are consistently faced with decisions of how to allocate a company's scarce resources to meet the demands of shareholders and other powerful and legitimate stakeholders. This article analyses whether higher union density at company level pushes management to engage more in corporate social responsibility (CSR). Drawing from stakeholder theory and the resource allocation approach of CSR as well as union voice and monopoly models, this article finds that companies have to substitute non-employee-oriented CSR with employee-oriented CSR as union density increases but is still at low levels. At higher levels of union density, companies can complement both types of CSR. This perhaps represents a reinforcement of mutual interests between management and organized labour, which has implications for managerial prerogatives as well as union positioning in the labour and political process.
机译：战略管理人员始终如一地面临着如何分配公司稀缺资源以满足股东和其他强大和合法利益攸关方的要求。本文分析了公司水平的更高元度密度是否推动管理层以更具企业社会责任（CSR）。从利益相关者理论和CSR的资源分配方法以及工会语音和垄断模型的资源分配方法，这篇文章认为，公司必须用员工导向的CSR替代非员工导向的CSR，因为联盟密度增加但仍处于低位。在较高层次的工会密度下，公司可以补充两种类型的CSR。这可能是在管理和有组织劳动之间的相互利益的加强，这对管理特权以及工会定位在劳动和政治过程中具有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号