• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Building and Environment >A comparison of occupant comfort and satisfaction between a green building and a conventional building
【24h】

A comparison of occupant comfort and satisfaction between a green building and a conventional building

机译：绿色建筑和传统建筑在居住者舒适度和满意度上的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

It has been argued that "green" buildings have a better indoor environmental quality (as measured by the comfort perceptions of occupants) than conventional buildings and that this translates into a more satisfying workplace for the building's occupants and, in turn, a more productive workforce. To test this we measured the comfort and satisfaction perceptions of the occupants of a green university building and two conventional university buildings with a questionnaire that asked occupants to rate their workplace environment in terms of aesthetics, serenity, lighting, acoustics, ventilation, temperature, humidity, and overall satisfaction. The university buildings at the centre of the study are located in Albury-Wodonga, in inland southeast Australia. The green building, which is naturally ventilated, is constructed from rammed earth and recycled materials. The conventional buildings have heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems and are of brick veneer construction. We found no evidence to believe that green buildings are more comfortable. Indeed, the only difference between the buildings was that occupants of the green building were more likely to perceive their work environment as warm, and occupants who felt warm were more likely to describe their work environment as poor. However, the hydronic cooling system of this building was malfunctioning at the time of the study and hence this result cannot be generalised as a difference between green buildings and conventional HVAC buildings. All other aspects of comfort, including aesthetics, serenity, lighting, ventilation, acoustics, and humidity, were not perceived differently by the occupants of the two types of building.
机译：有人认为，“绿色”建筑的室内环境质量（通过居住者的舒适感来衡量）比传统建筑更好，并且这为建筑物的居住者提供了更令人满意的工作场所，从而提高了劳动生产率。为了测试这一点，我们通过问卷调查了绿色大学建筑和两座传统大学建筑的居民对舒适度和满意度的看法，该调查表要求居民根据美学，宁静，照明，声学，通风，温度，湿度对工作环境进行评分，以及整体满意度。研究中心的大学建筑位于澳大利亚东南部内陆的Albury-Wodonga。绿色建筑是自然通风的，是用夯土和可回收材料建造的。常规建筑物具有供暖，通风和空调（HVAC）系统，并且为砖饰面结构。我们没有证据表明绿色建筑更舒适。的确，建筑物之间的唯一区别是绿色建筑物的居住者更有可能将其工作环境视为温暖，而感到温暖的居住者则更有可能将其工作环境描述为贫困。但是，该建筑物的水力冷却系统在研究时出现了故障，因此，该结果不能概括为绿色建筑物与常规HVAC建筑物之间的差异。两种类型的居住者对舒适性的所有其他方面（包括美学，宁静，照明，通风，声学和湿度）的看法都不相同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号