...
首页> 外文期刊>Building research & information >Exploring views on communal amenities and well-being in housing for seniors in Taiwan
【24h】

Exploring views on communal amenities and well-being in housing for seniors in Taiwan

机译:探索台湾老年人住房的公共设施和幸福位置

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to learn views from healthcare practitioners and the general public for housing communal amenities that could best support senior well-being for ageing in place. The literature review identified 30 popular communal amenities and was tested via a questionnaire survey conducted in Taiwan. Participants (N?=?759) evaluated the importance level of the proposed amenities with five-point Likert scale. Data were analysed with Friedman Ranking Test and Kruskal?Wallis test. Results showed that both respondent groups placed outdoor open space, trail and garden with seat as top three important amenities, where outdoor and multifunction were the spatial and functional qualities. While the general public believed physical category amenities were more important, healthcare practitioners put emphasis on social and spiritual categories. Within the general public group, respondents aged 65 years and older had different views than younger respondents on dog run area, BBQ areas and video game room. Swimming pool and religious space were viewed as an important amenity by respondents from different regions. It was concluded that in Taiwan, views may differ with upbringing and cultural backgrounds, residing regions and age. The initial findings can assist policymakers, real estate developers and designers for decision-making in future housing projects.
机译:本研究的目的是学习医疗保健从业者和公众住房公共设施的意见,这些公共设施可以最好地支持高级福祉。文献综述确定了30家受欢迎的公共设施,并通过台湾进行的调查问卷调查进行了测试。参与者(n?=?759)评估了五分李克特规模的建议设施的重要性水平。用弗里德曼排名测试和kruskal进行分析数据?沃兹·沃尔斯试验。结果表明,受访者群体均放置户外开放空间,小径和花园,坐落为前三个重要设施,其中户外和多功能是空间和功能性质。虽然公众认为物理类别设施更为重要,但医疗保健从业者强调社会和精神类别。在一般公共集团中,65岁及以上的受访者比狗跑区,烧烤区和视频游戏室的年轻受访者不同的观点不同。游泳池和宗教空间被不同地区的受访者视为一个重要的舒适性。得出结论认为,在台湾,观点可能与养育和文化背景,居住地区和年龄不同。最初的调查结果可以帮助政策制定者,房地产开发商和设计师进行未来的住房项目决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号