• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Building research & information >Advocating an ambivalent approach to theorizing the built environment
【24h】

Advocating an ambivalent approach to theorizing the built environment

机译：提倡对建筑环境进行理论分析的矛盾方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper outlines the breadth of approaches to conceptualization of the built environment that exist across a range of literature sets, including construction management, architectural design and organization theory. It considers the commensurability, or otherwise, of different theoretical perspectives based upon their grounding in different ontological and epistemological stances. It also considers the basis of models derived of empirical engagement with practice. In contemplating the relationship between theory and practice throughout the life cycle of the built environment, along with the range of involved stakeholders; and illustrated by reference to the example of the contemporary 'workplace'; an ambivalent approach to theorizing at the local level of involved actors is proposed. In this approach, conceptualization of the built environment is based not upon early exclusive either/or choices between different theories and models, but rather upon inclusive both/and considerations. However, this does not mean that all are considered as equally valid in the outcomes of decision-making, and the role of power and politics is acknowledged within the process of negotiation of a 'good' outcome. The potential, and the limitations, of this ambivalent approach are informed by a contemporary social science interpretation of the concept of phronesis, or practical wisdom, which has roots in Aristotelian philosophy.
机译：本文概述了涵盖建筑管理，建筑设计和组织理论等一系列文献的建筑环境概念化方法的广度。它基于不同的理论观点在不同的本体论和认识论立场下的可比性或其他方面。它还考虑了经验参与实践的模型基础。在整个建筑环境的整个生命周期中考虑理论与实践之间的关系，以及相关利益相关者的范围；并以当代“工作场所”为例进行说明；提出了在参与方的地方层面进行理论化的矛盾方法。在这种方法中，构建环境的概念化不是基于早期在不同理论和模型之间的排他性/或选择，而是基于包含性两者/和考虑因素。但是，这并不意味着所有人在决策结果中都被认为是同样有效的，而权力和政治的作用在“好的”结果的谈判过程中得到了承认。这种矛盾的方法的潜力和局限性来自当代社会科学对语气或实践智慧概念的解释，这种概念源于亚里士多德哲学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号