...
首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering >Shaking table tests of structures with hysteretic dampers: experimental results versus prediction using non-linear static methods
【24h】

Shaking table tests of structures with hysteretic dampers: experimental results versus prediction using non-linear static methods

机译:带有滞回阻尼器的结构的振动台试验:实验结果与使用非线性静态方法的预测

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The use of seismic hysteretic dampers for passive control is increasing exponentially in recent years for both new and existing buildings. In order to utilize hysteretic dampers within a structural system, it is of paramount importance to have simplified design procedures based upon knowledge gained from theoretical studies and validated with experimental results. Non-linear Static Procedures (NSPs) are presented as an alternative to the force-based methods more common nowadays. The application of NSPs to conventional structures has been well established; yet there is a lack of experimental information on how NSPs apply to systems with hysteretic dampers. In this research, several shaking table tests were conducted on two single bay and single story 1:2 scale structures with and without hysteretic dampers. The maximum response of the structure with dampers in terms of lateral displacement and base shear obtained from the tests was compared with the prediction provided by three well-known NSPs: (1) the improved version of the Capacity Spectrum Method (CSM) from FEMA 440; (2) the improved version of the Displacement Coefficient Method (DCM) from FEMA 440; and (3) the N2 Method implemented in Eurocode 8. In general, the improved version of the DCM and N2 methods are found to provide acceptable accuracy in prediction, but the CSM tends to underestimate the response.
机译:近年来,无论是对于新建筑物还是现有建筑物,地震迟滞阻尼器用于被动控制的使用均呈指数级增长。为了在结构系统中利用磁滞阻尼器,基于从理论研究中获得的知识并通过实验结果进行验证的简化设计程序至关重要。提出了非线性静态程序(NSP),以替代当今更常见的基于力的方法。 NSP在常规结构中的应用已得到很好的确立。但是,缺乏关于NSP如何应用于带滞回阻尼器的系统的实验信息。在这项研究中,在带有和不带有滞回阻尼器的两个单舱和单层1:2比例结构上进行了几个振动台测试。从测试中获得的带有阻尼器的结构在横向位移和基础剪力方面的最大响应与三个著名的NSP提供的预测进行了比较:(1)FEMA 440改进的“容量谱法(CSM)” ; (2)FEMA 440的改进的位移系数法(DCM); (3)欧洲规范8中实施的N2方法。通常,发现DCM和N2方法的改进版本在预测中提供了可接受的准确性,但是CSM往往低估了响应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号