• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Cambridge Review of International Affairs >The G8Â 1/2: the EU's contested and ambiguous actorness in the G8
【24h】

The G8Â 1/2: the EU's contested and ambiguous actorness in the G8

机译：G8 1/2：欧盟在八国集团中充满争议和big昧的行为

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article analyses the degree of European Union (EU) actorness within the Group of Eight (G8). Drawing on the work of Jupille and Caporaso, actorness is probed along the criteria of recognition, authority, cohesion and autonomy. We argue that the vague, flexible and informal nature of the G8 has contributed to rather nuanced and ambiguous degrees of actorness. When assessing the above criteria, overall the EU's actorness remains questionable. As for recognition, while the EU is treated as an equal by other G8 delegations, actual membership remains disputed, and third parties such as the media remain reluctant to accept EU representation as equal. Authority in terms of legal competence tends to be of lesser importance in the G8, given the informal nature of this institution. Informally, the Commission has managed to enhance its authority when it can provide substantial expertise. Cohesion has proven perhaps the most limited aspect of EU actorness. Although value cohesion is substantial, there are no formal mechanisms that tie the European participants together. Commission autonomy in the G8 is considerable in terms of its own separate institutional apparatus, as well as formal performance and compliance scores that differ from those of the European G8 members. However, ultimately the Commission's freedom of action usually remains subject to the control of its principals. Yet, EU actorness tends to differ per context as our tentative analysis of the factors conducive to autonomy indicates.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2011.558488
机译：本文分析了八国集团（G8）中欧盟（EU）行动的程度。借鉴朱庇勒和卡普拉索索的作品，以承认，权威，凝聚力和自主性为标准来探索行动。我们认为，八国集团的含糊，灵活和非正式性质造成了行为上相当细微和模棱两可的程度。在评估上述标准时，总体而言，欧盟的行为仍然值得怀疑。至于承认，尽管其他八国集团（G8）代表团将欧盟视为平等，但实际成员资格仍存在争议，媒体等第三方仍然不愿接受欧盟的平等代表权。考虑到该机构的非正式性质，在八国集团中，法律权限方面的权威往往不那么重要。在可以提供大量专业知识的情况下，委员会已非正式地设法增强了其权威。凝聚力可能已经证明是欧盟行为的最有限的方面。尽管价值凝聚力很强，但没有正式的机制将欧洲参与者捆绑在一起。八国集团（G8）拥有独立的机构机制，以及与欧洲八国集团（G8）成员不同的正式绩效和合规性评分，具有很大的委员会自治权。但是，最终，委员会的行动自由通常仍受其负责人控制。然而，随着我们对有助于自治的因素的初步分析表明，欧盟的行动方式在每种情况下往往会有所不同。查看全文下载全文相关的变量add add_id Delicious，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布号：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2011.558488

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号