...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science >Napoleon and the Bibliometric Evaluation of Research: Considerations on University Reform and the Action of the National Evaluation Agency in Italy
【24h】

Napoleon and the Bibliometric Evaluation of Research: Considerations on University Reform and the Action of the National Evaluation Agency in Italy

机译：拿破仑与研究的文献计量评估：对大学改革和意大利国家评估机构采取行动的思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The academic reforms in Italy have introduced innovations in a Napoleonic administrative apparatus unfit to receive them, thus generating a completely unbalanced institutional system. The system's center of gravity has moved from the administration by the ministry to the National Agency for the Evaluation of University and Research (ANVUR), assigning directly to the elite group chosen by the government enormous power on research and the universities, without counterweight. The poor design of the governance of the ANVUR has resulted in the realization of technically inadequate evaluations. Criticism addressed to the evaluation activities and to the bibliometric methods used have revived the debate on research policy in Italy, with the emergence of a scientific counter-public.
机译：意大利的学术改革已在拿破仑行政管理机构中引入了不适合接受的创新，从而产生了完全不平衡的制度体系。该系统的重心已经从政府部门转移到了国家大学和研究评估局（ANVUR），直接分配给了由政府选择的，在研究和大学方面拥有巨大权力的精英集团，而没有任何权重。 ANVUR治理的设计欠佳，导致在技术上评估不足。对评鉴活动和所使用的文献计量方法的批评，随着科学的反公开现象的出现，使关于研究政策的争论重新燃起。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号