• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Challenge >The Public,Taxes, and the Fiscal Cliff
【24h】

The Public,Taxes, and the Fiscal Cliff

机译：公众，税收和财政悬崖

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Public opinion will not help Congress decide how to deal with the fiscal cliff-the congressional agreement under the Budget Control Act to raise taxes and cut spending in 2013 that cquld devastate a weak economy if passed. In their annual assessment of American public opinion, the authors find that Americans only agree that taxes for the wealthy and big business should be raised. As for cutting social programs, they are lukewarm at best. How can we solve the problem?rnIn trying to deal with the "fiscal cliff," public opinion is not going to be very helpful in resolving many of the tough budgetary and tax issues facing Congress and the president. First, there are huge partisan differences among the American public on taxes and spending cuts. Second, with the exception of the widespread view that high-income people and large corporations should be paying higher taxes, Americans are divided on how to cut the federal budget deficit.
机译：舆论不会帮助国会决定如何应对财政悬崖。根据《预算控制法》，国会同意在2013年提高税收和削减支出，如果通过的话，这可能会破坏疲软的经济。在对美国舆论的年度评估中，作者发现美国人只同意应为富人和大企业加税。至于削减社会方案，它们充其量是冷淡的。在解决“财政悬崖”的过程中，舆论对解决国会和总统面临的许多棘手的预算和税收问题将无济于事。首先，美国公众在税收和削减支出方面存在巨大的党派分歧。其次，除了普遍认为高收入人士和大公司应缴纳更高税款的观点外，美国人在如何削减联邦预算赤字方面存在分歧。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Challenge》 |2012年第6期|p.5-25|共21页
  • 作者

    Robert Blendon; John Benson;

  • 作者单位

    Harvard School of Public Health and the Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University;

    Harvard Opinion Research Program at the Harvard School of Public Health;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号