首页> 外文期刊>China Journal of Social Work >Black cat, white cat: a pragmatic and collaborative approach to evidence-based social work in China
【24h】

Black cat, white cat: a pragmatic and collaborative approach to evidence-based social work in China

机译:黑猫,白猫:在中国开展基于证据的社会工作的务实合作方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Current thinking suggests that evidence-based practice (EBP) is a key to unlocking the potential for social work development in mainland China. But Chinese social workers may be confronted by the challenges of EBP in using research evidence, exercising expert judgment, as well as considering client characteristics, as social work is a relatively new enterprise in China's unique social-economic-political context. There is little indigenous research evidence for Chinese social workers to refer to. There are few experienced social workers and researchers since social work practice, education and research were reinstated only in the late 1980s. Mainland Chinese may not be aware of what social workers can do and may prefer authority-based practice. This paper aims to first review the definition of EBP, followed by a discussion of the challenges and opportunities in applying EBP to social work in China. It then highlights the usefulness of collaboration between academics, practitioners, and clients in implementing EBP. A recent research project on ex-offenders and their family members in Singapore is used to illustrate the feasibility of collaboration between academia and the field. 1980
机译:当前的想法表明,循证实践(EBP)是释放中国大陆社会工作发展潜力的关键。但是,由于社会工作在中国独特的社会经济政治环境中是一个相对较新的企业,因此在使用研究证据,行使专家判断以及考虑客户特征方面,中国社会工作者可能会面临挑战。很少有本土研究证据可供中国社会工作者参考。自从1980年代末才恢复社会工作实践,教育和研究以来,经验丰富的社会工作者和研究人员很少。中国大陆人可能不知道社会工作者能做什么,并且可能更喜欢基于权威的实践。本文旨在首先回顾一下EBP的定义,然后讨论将EBP应用于中国社会工作的挑战和机遇。然后,它强调了学者,从业者和客户之间进行协作对实施EBP的有用性。最近在新加坡进行的一项关于前犯罪者及其家人的研究项目被用来说明学术界与该领域合作的可行性。 1980

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号