首页> 外文期刊>Clinical governance >The role of information governance within English clinical governance: Observations based upon the interim report from the NIGC of the Care Quality Commission
【24h】

The role of information governance within English clinical governance: Observations based upon the interim report from the NIGC of the Care Quality Commission

机译:信息治理在英语临床治理中的作用:基于护理质量委员会NIGC中期报告的观察结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is designed to explore the relationship between information and clinical governance in the English NHS. Design/methodology/approach - The paper is a personal reflection based upon the interim report of the National Information Governance Committee (NIGC) of the Care Quality Commission. Findings - The contribution of the NIGC to clinical governance in England has been significant for a number of reasons. Most notably, it has been embedded at the heart of an organisation concerned with the whole spectrum of health and social care, with a role where information is seen predominately as a means to deliver better care rather than an end in itself. The recommendation to establish a specific and mandatory information governance (IG) element of the inspection regime reflects the fact that without validation of the evidence base, the whole inspection regime may be seen as resting on insecure foundations, and provides re-assurance in the integrity of the whole inspection process, well beyond the scope of IG. Originality/value - The paper provides an insight into policy making at the heart of clinical governance, and its relationship with IG. It highlights the fact that the work of the NIGC has placed validation of information at the heart of the new CQC inspection regime, providing increased confidence in the information on which the rest of the inspection process is based.
机译:目的-本文的目的旨在探讨英语NHS中信息与临床治理之间的关系。设计/方法/方法-本文是根据护理质量委员会国家信息治理委员会(NIGC)的中期报告得出的个人看法。研究结果-由于多种原因,NIGC对英格兰的临床管理做出了重要贡献。最值得注意的是,它已被植入与整个健康和社会护理有关的组织的心脏中,其作用是将信息主要视为提供更好护理的一种手段,而不是最终目的。关于建立检查制度的特定和强制性信息治理(IG)要素的建议反映了以下事实:如果没有验证证据基础,则整个检查制度可能被视为基于不安全的基础,并在完整性方面提供了保证。整个检查过程,远远超出了IG的范围。原创性/价值-本文提供了对临床治理核心政策制定及其与IG关系的见解。它强调了一个事实,即NIGC的工作已将信息验证置于新的CQC检查制度的核心,从而增加了对其余检查过程所基于的信息的信心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号