• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Cognitive science >Moving Through Time: The Role of Personality in Three Real-Life Contexts
【24h】

Moving Through Time: The Role of Personality in Three Real-Life Contexts

机译：穿越时空：人格在三种现实生活中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

AbstractIn English, two deictic space-time metaphors are in common usage: the Moving Ego metaphor conceptualizes the ego as moving forward through time and the Moving Time metaphor conceptualizes time as moving forward toward the ego (Clark, 1973). Although earlier research investigating the psychological reality of these metaphors has typically examined spatial influences on temporal reasoning (e.g., Boroditsky & Ramscar, 2002), recent lines of research have extended beyond this, providing initial evidence that personality differences and emotional experiences may also influence how people reason about events in time (Duffy & Feist, 2014; Hauser, Carter, & Meier, 2009; Richmond, Wilson, & Zinken, 2012). In this article, we investigate whether these relationships have force in real life. Building on the effects of individual differences in self-reported conscientiousness and procrastination found by Duffy and Feist (2014), we examined whether, in addition to self-reported conscientiousness and procrastination, there is a relationship between conscientious and procrastinating behaviors and temporal perspective. We found that participants who adopted the Moving Time perspective were more likely to exhibit conscientious behaviors, while those who adopted the Moving Ego perspective were more likely to procrastinate, suggesting that the earlier effects reach beyond the laboratory.
机译：摘要在英语中，两个常见的时空隐喻是常用的：移动自我隐喻将自我概念化为在时间中前进，而移动时间隐喻则将时间概念化为在自我中前进（Clark，1973）。尽管较早的研究这些隐喻的心理现实的研究通常考察了空间对时间推理的影响（例如，Boroditsky＆Ramscar，2002），但最近的研究范围已经超出了这一范围，提供了初步的证据表明人格差异和情感经历也可能影响时间推理。人们会及时了解事件发生的原因（Duffy和Feist，2014年； Hauser，Carter和Meier，2009年； Richmond，Wilson和Zinken，2012年）。在本文中，我们研究了这些关系在现实生活中是否具有影响力。基于达菲和费斯特（Duffy and Feist，2014）发现的自我报告的自觉尽责和拖延的个体差异的影响，我们研究了自我报告的尽责和拖延之外，自觉和拖延行为与时间观点之间是否存在关联。我们发现，采用“移动时间”观点的参与者更有可能表现出尽责的行为，而那些采用“移动自我”观点的参与者则更有可能拖延，这表明早期的影响超出了实验室。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号