首页> 外文期刊>Cognitive Science >In Praise of a Model but Not Its Conclusions: Commentary on Cooper, Catmur, and Heyes (2012)
【24h】

In Praise of a Model but Not Its Conclusions: Commentary on Cooper, Catmur, and Heyes (2012)

机译:赞美模型而非结论:Cooper,Catmur和Heyes评论(2012)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Cooper et al. (this issue) develop an interactive activation model of spatial and imitative compatibilities that simulates the key results from Catmur and Heyes (2011) and thus conclude that both compatibilities are mediated by the same processes since their single model can predict all the results. Although the model is impressive, the conclusions are premature because they are based on an incomplete review of the relevant literature and because the model includes some questionable assumptions. Moreover, a competing model (Scheutz & Bertenthal, 2012) is introduced that suggests the two compatibilities are not mediated by the same processes. We propose that more research is necessary before concluding that spatial and imitative compatibilities are mediated by the same processes.
机译:库珀等。 (本期)开发了一种空间和模拟兼容性的交互式激活模型,该模型可以模拟Catmur和Heyes(2011)的主要结果,因此得出结论,这两个兼容性是由相同的过程介导的,因为它们的单个模型可以预测所有结果。尽管该模型令人印象深刻,但结论尚为时过早,因为这些结论是基于对相关文献的不完整评论,并且该模型包括一些可疑的假设。此外,引入了竞争模型(Scheutz&Bertenthal,2012),该模型表明这两种兼容性不是由相同的过程介导的。我们认为,在得出空间和模拟相容性是由相同过程介导的结论之前,有必要进行更多的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号