...
【24h】

Rethinking CRAAP

机译:重新思考CRAAP

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

For over two decades, librarians have been at the forefront of helping their patrons and students discern what online information is reliable, and what may be biased or outright false. Particularly as more formal information literacy programs developed at the college and university level (and the attendant inclusion of information literacy in many general education programs), academic librarians have developed curricula and taught students how to evaluate web sources for credibility. In many institutions, this has frequently been achieved via a "one-shot" session with a checklist of sorts, often some variation of the CRAAP Method (Currency, Reliability, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose) developed nearly 15 years ago at California State University-Chico.~1
机译:在过去的二十多年中,图书馆员一直在帮助他们的顾客和学生辨别哪些在线信息是可靠的,哪些信息可能有偏见或完全是虚假的。尤其是随着在大学和大学级别上开发了更正式的信息素养计划(以及随之而来的许多普通教育计划中的信息素养纳入),大学图书馆员也开发了课程,并教给学生如何评估网络资源的信誉。在许多机构中,这通常是通过一次“一次性”会议来完成的,该会议带有各种清单,通常是近15年前在加利福尼亚州制定的CRAAP方法(货币,可靠性,权威性,准确性和目的)的某些变体。大学-Chico。〜1

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号