• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Communication Law and Policy >Prying, Spying, and Lying: Intrusive Newsgathering and What the Law Should Do About It
【24h】

Prying, Spying, and Lying: Intrusive Newsgathering and What the Law Should Do About It

机译：窥探，间谍和谎言：侵入性的新闻和法律应该对此做些什么

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

If the law of invasion of privacy is the child of the seminal Samuel Warren and Louis Brandeis law review article of 1890, then the modern newsgathering and privacy law in Larissa Lidsky's 1998 article, "Prying, Spying, and Lying," can be its grandchild or great-grandchild. While Warren and Brandeis wrote critically in response to the growth and expansion of photography and the gossipy tabloids of their day, Lidsky takes a century's worth of media and technological developments and newsgathering itself to task as well. By the late 1990s, invasion of privacy law had its legs, recognized in various forms in every state and addressed by aspects of a number of federal statutes. However, invasion of privacy law, as Lidsky addresses, was still catching up with both the technology of modern media and the standards of what society deems worthy of legal protections.
机译：如果隐私的入侵法是1890年的精选塞米尔沃伦和路易斯布朗斯·法律审查条款，那么现代Newsgathering和Privacy法在Larissa Lidsky的1998年文章中，“撬动，间谍和撒谎”，可以成为其孙子或孙子。虽然Warren和Brandeis批判性地批评摄影的增长和扩张和他们一天的八卦小报，但Lidsky也需要一个世纪的媒体和技术发展，并使自己成为任务。到了20世纪90年代末，侵犯隐私法的腿部，各州的各种形式得到了各种形式，并由多个联邦法规的各个方面解决。然而，作为Lidsky地址的侵犯隐私法仍在追赶现代媒体技术以及值得法律保护的社会的标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号