首页> 外文期刊>SMU science and technology law review >Kubert v. Best: Oops, I Sent it Again!
【24h】

Kubert v. Best: Oops, I Sent it Again!

机译:Kubert诉Best:糟糕,我再次发送了!

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Text messages permit cell phone users to maintain communication in situations where a voice call would be impractical, impossible, or socially unacceptable. Because of the distraction that this new form of communication might bring, some states have rightly provided civil and criminal penalties for those who text while driving and, as a result, unintentionally injure others.1 Kubert v. Best takes a radical approach in fighting the texting while driving craze. The issue in this case is whether a person, who is not operating a motor vehicle but sending a text message to the operator of a motor vehicle, may also be liable to persons because the driver was distracted by receiving the text message.
机译:文本消息允许手机用户在语音呼叫不切实际,不可能或社交上无法接受的情况下保持通信。由于这种新的交流方式可能会分散注意力,因此某些州正确地对驾车时发短信的人处以民事和刑事处罚,结果无意中伤害了其他人。1Kubert v。Best采取了激进的方式与发狂时发短信。在这种情况下的问题是,未驾驶机动车辆而是向汽车的操作者发送文本消息的人是否也可能对人负责,因为驾驶员由于接收文本消息而分心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号