• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Computer law & security report >The E-commerce Law of the People's Republic of China: E-commerce platform operators liability for third-party patent infringement
【24h】

The E-commerce Law of the People's Republic of China: E-commerce platform operators liability for third-party patent infringement

机译：中华人民共和国电子商务法：电子商务平台运营商对第三方专利侵权的责任

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The E-Commerce Law of the People's Republic of China(E-commerce Law) was enacted on August 31, 2018. One of the hottest topics is e-commerce platform operators (EPOs) liability for third-party patent infringement. The EPOs, which provide platform services rather than participating in trade directly, must try to maintain the balance between patentees and social interests. Due to the particularities of the patent infringement review, it is difficult for the EPOs to fulfil the task. Thus, the EPOs liability for copyright and trademark infringement is likely unworkable in the patent area. A China practice review will be helpful in analysing the problem; the guiding case No. 83 is an especially meaningful reference. The E-Commerce Law is principled and advisory - it is impossible to distinguish the limits of EPOs liability for third-party patent infringement by differentiating the patent from other intellectual property rights. After reviewing the regulations on the general and intellectual property duty of care of EPOs, this article argues that the E-Commerce Law still has some specific problems. Consequently, to implement the E-Commerce Law, judicial interpretation and detailed rules for implementation should be formulated as soon as possible, and the potential solutions are described in the conclusion. (C) 2019 Weijun Huang and Xiaoqiu Li. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译：《中华人民共和国电子商务法》（《电子商务法》）于2018年8月31日颁布。最热门的话题之一是电子商务平台运营商（EPO）对第三方专利侵权的责任。提供平台服务而不是直接参与贸易的EPO必须设法维护专利权人与社会利益之间的平衡。由于专利侵权审查的特殊性，EPO很难完成任务。因此，EPO的版权和商标侵权责任在专利领域可能不可行。对中国的实践审查将有助于分析问题； 83号指导案例是一个特别有意义的参考。 《电子商务法》是原则性和咨询性的-不可能通过将专利与其他知识产权区分开来区分EPO对第三方专利侵权的责任范围。在回顾了关于EPO的一般和知识产权义务的规定之后，本文认为《电子商务法》仍然存在一些具体问题。因此，为实施《电子商务法》，应尽快制定司法解释和详细的实施规则，并在结论中说明可能的解决方案。 （C）2019黄卫军和李小秋。由Elsevier Ltd.出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号