...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Computers in Human Behavior >Visualizers versus verbalizers: Effects of cognitive style on learning with texts and pictures - An eye-tracking study
【24h】

Visualizers versus verbalizers: Effects of cognitive style on learning with texts and pictures - An eye-tracking study

机译：可视化工具与口头表达工具：认知风格对文字和图片学习的影响-眼动研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study was conducted in order to examine the differences between visualizers and verbalizers in the way they gaze at pictures and texts while learning. Using a collection of questionnaires, college students were classified according to their visual or verbal cognitive style and were asked to learn about two different, in terms of subject and type of knowledge, topics by means of text-picture combinations. Eye tracking was used to investigate their gaze behavior. The results show that visualizers spent significantly more time inspecting pictures than verbalizers, while verbalizers spent more time inspecting texts. Results also suggest that both visualizers' and verbalizers' way of learning is active but mostly within areas providing the source of information in line with their cognitive style (pictures or text). Verbalizers tended to enter non-informative, irrelevant areas of pictures sooner than visualizers. The comparison of learning outcomes showed that the group of visualizers achieved better results than the group of verbalizers on a comprehension test. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译：进行这项研究是为了检查可视化工具和语言表达工具在学习时注视图片和文字的方式之间的差异。使用一系列调查表，根据大学生的视觉或言语认知方式对其进行分类，并要求他们通过文字图片组合来了解两种不同的主题（即知识和知识类型）。眼动追踪用于调查他们的注视行为。结果表明，可视化人员花了更多的时间检查图片，而不是口头翻译，而口头表达者花了更多的时间检查文本。结果还表明，可视化者和语言表达者的学习方式都很活跃，但大多在提供与其认知风格（图片或文字）一致的信息源的区域内。语言表达者倾向于比视觉化者更快地进入非信息性，无关的图片区域。学习结果的比较表明，在理解测试中，可视化工具组的结果要优于语言处理工具组。 （C）2016作者。由Elsevier Ltd.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号