首页> 外文期刊>Construction Management and Economics >Graham Ive and the methodology of construction economics
【24h】

Graham Ive and the methodology of construction economics

机译:格雷厄姆·艾夫(Graham Ive)和建筑经济学的方法论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Graham Ive's central contribution to our methodological debate was his insistence on the firm as the analytical unit. Ive argues we should reject theories if the aspect of construction we are examining does not satisfy the assumptions of a particular theoretical model. We see this in his rejection of neoclassical economic theories in the two topics discussed in this paper: the adoption of innovations in construction; and microeconomic analysis as it relates to price determination in the market for construction. The former requires studying not just participants in the building process, but also participants in the innovation process, and the latter uses post-Keynesian pricing theory where prices are set according to mark-up procedures and vary with costs, but not directly with demand. This is in contrast to the general equilibrium, perfectly competitive price setting of neoclassical economics. Ive and his collaborators show a way towards better research in their emphasis on theory and the insistence that for construction economics the analytical units are the industry and the firm, not the project. Ive's concern is that the processes involved in organizing the production of buildings should be seen as a distinctive and defining element of our analysis of the industry.
机译:格雷厄姆·艾夫(Graham Ive)对方法论辩论的主要贡献是他坚持将公司作为分析单位。艾夫认为,如果我们正在研究的结构方面不满足特定理论模型的假设,我们应该拒绝理论。我们在他对本文讨论的两个主题中对新古典经济学理论的拒绝中看到了这一点。以及涉及建筑市场价格确定的微观经济分析。前者不仅需要研究建筑过程中的参与者,还需要研究创新过程中的参与者,而后者则使用凯恩斯主义后的定价理论,即根据加价程序确定价格,价格随成本而变化,但不随需求而变化。这与新古典经济学的一般均衡,完全竞争价格设定相反。艾夫和他的合作者通过强调理论和坚持认为对于建筑经济学来说,分析单位是行业和企业,而不是项目,表明了一种进行更好研究的方法。 Ive担心的是,组织建筑生产所涉及的过程应被视为我们对该行业进行分析的独特且确定的元素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号