• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Criminal Justice Studies: A Critical Journal of Crime, Law and Society >Wreck on the highway: the Supreme Court, search incident to arrest, the good faith exception, and Davis v. United States
【24h】

Wreck on the highway: the Supreme Court, search incident to arrest, the good faith exception, and Davis v. United States

机译：在高速公路上残骸：最高法院，逮捕的搜查事件，善意例外以及戴维斯诉美国

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In 1981, the Supreme Court held that when a police officer arrests the occupant of an automobile, the officer may search the automobile’s passenger compartment incident to the arrest, and this search may take place even after the suspect has been handcuffed and secured in a police vehicle. This decision created a bright-line rule for searches incident to arrest in automobiles and was easy to apply; it lacked, however, any logical connection to the rationale for the original search incident exception, since it was clearly impossible for an arrested suspect to gain access to the vehicle compartment once he was secured in a police vehicle. In 2009, the Supreme Court held that the so-called Belton rule did not apply when the person arrested has been removed from the vehicle and secured. In 2011, the Supreme Court applied the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule to a search incident of an automobile that took place prior to Gant. Davis is the latest in a series of decisions weakening the protections of the exclusionary rule in the interests of efficient police work.View full textDownload full textKeywordspolice, Supreme Court, search incident, exclusionary rule, good faith exceptionRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2012.699737
机译：1981年，最高法院裁定，当警务人员逮捕汽车乘员时，该警官可以对与逮捕有关的汽车乘客舱进行搜查，即使在嫌疑犯被戴上手铐并系好安全带后，搜查仍可能进行。在警车上。该决定为在汽车中逮捕事故的搜查创造了明晰的规则，并且易于实施。但是，它与原始搜索事件例外的理由没有任何逻辑联系，因为被捕嫌疑人一旦被固定在警车中，显然不可能进入车厢。 2009年，最高法院裁定，当被捕者已从车辆中移出并加以保护时，所谓的Belton规则并不适用。 2011年，最高法院将排除规则的善意例外适用于Gant之前发生的汽车搜查事件。戴维斯（David Davis）是一系列为了提高警察效率而削弱对排除规则的保护的最新决定。查看全文下载全文关键字警察，最高法院，搜查事件，排除规则，善意例外相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“ Taylor ＆Francis Online”，services_compact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，delicious，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布号：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2012.699737

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号