• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Criminal Justice Studies: A Critical Journal of Crime, Law and Society >Writing a manual for police officers: the Supreme Court revisits the vehicle search incident to arrest rule in Arizona v. Gant
【24h】

Writing a manual for police officers: the Supreme Court revisits the vehicle search incident to arrest rule in Arizona v. Gant

机译：为警官撰写手册：最高法院重新审查了车辆搜寻事件，以逮捕亚利桑那诉甘特州的规则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In this article the authors examine the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Arizona v. Gant and argue that the high court correctly clarified the law regarding what police may do when conducting a search incident to the arrest of someone in a vehicle. In the following article, friend and colleague Martin O’Connor argues the Supreme Court (and this article) are wrong and that the decision will negatively impact police investigation of criminal activity.View full textDownload full textKeywordsSupreme Court, police, search incident exceptionRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2010.502337
机译：在本文中，作者检查了最高法院在Arizona v。Gant案中的最新裁决，并辩称高等法院正确地阐明了有关警察在进行搜捕车辆中的某人的搜查事件时可能采取的行动的法律。在下一篇文章中，朋友和同事马丁·奥康纳（MartinOâConnor）辩称最高法院（和本文）是错误的，该裁决将对警察对犯罪活动的调查产生负面影响。查看全文下载全文关键字最高法院，警察，搜索事件例外相关变量addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”，servicescompact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，delicious，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2010.502337

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号