首页> 外文期刊>Cultural Trends >Meaningful measurement: a literature review and Australian and British case studies of arts organizations conducting “artistic self-assessment”
【24h】

Meaningful measurement: a literature review and Australian and British case studies of arts organizations conducting “artistic self-assessment”

机译:有意义的衡量:文献综述以及对进行“艺术性自我评估”的艺术组织的澳大利亚和英国案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Funding bodies, donors and boards around the world increasingly require arts organizations to conduct performance measurement. This often extends to measuring an organization's artistic excellence, or, in Australian terms, “artistic vibrancy”. In some countries, such as England and Australia, funding bodies require major arts organizations to “self-assess” their own artistic excellence and vibrancy. But can such a thing really be measured? In 2009, the Australia Council for the Arts conducted research into the concept of measuring artistic vibrancy. As there had been little formal research in the area, the Australia Council conducted primary research into what might represent “good practice” in artistic self-assessment amongst major performing arts organizations in Australia and the United Kingdom, in the art forms of opera, orchestral and chamber music, dance and theatre (including circus). The researchers' key finding was that there is no “one size fits all” approach to assessing artistic vibrancy. Arts organizations will adopt a variety of methods that suit their unique environments, both across art forms and within them. However, in general, it was found that good practice in artistic self-assessment almost always involved: a frank culture of feedback, within the organization, and with audiences and external stake holders; a meaningful engagement with assessment as part of a performance improvement process, and a related aversion to “box ticking”; a genuine commitment to peer review; and acting on the outcomes of artistic self-assessment to improve future work. This article will examine the Australian policy context of the research, review the literature in relation to measuring “artistic vibrancy”, and present key, good practice case studies of “artistic self-assessment”, including the Royal Opera House and Scottish Opera, United Kingdom, and Circus Oz, Australia. The article will conclude with an analysis of the findings from the case studies, and suggestions for further research and policy directions for other funding bodies grappling with the issue of how to measure artistic vibrancy.View full textDownload full textKeywordsartistic assessment, Australia, performing arts, BritainRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2010.515004
机译:世界各地的资助机构,捐赠者和董事会日益要求艺术组织进行绩效评估。这通常扩展到衡量组织的艺术成就,或者用澳大利亚的话来说,是“艺术活力”。在某些国家,例如英格兰和澳大利亚,资助机构要求主要的艺术组织“自我评估”自己的艺术才能和活力。但是这样的事情真的可以衡量吗? 2009年,澳大利亚艺术理事会对衡量艺术活力的概念进行了研究。由于该地区几乎没有正式的研究,因此澳大利亚理事会对澳大利亚和英国主要表演艺术组织以艺术形式进行的艺术自我评估中可能代表“良好实践”的内容进行了初步研究。歌剧,管弦乐队和室内音乐,舞蹈和戏剧(包括马戏团)。研究人员的主要发现是,没有一种“一刀切”的方法来评估艺术活力。艺术组织将采用各种适合其独特环境的方法,无论是跨艺术形式还是内部形式。但是,总的来说,人们发现,艺术自我评估的良好实践几乎总是涉及到的:组织内部以及与受众和外部利益相关者的坦率反馈文化;作为绩效改进过程的一部分,与评估进行有意义的互动,以及对“盒子打勾”的相关厌恶;对同行评审的真诚承诺;并根据艺术自我评估的结果采取行动,以改善未来的工作。本文将研究该研究的澳大利亚政策背景,回顾与测量“艺术活力”有关的文献,并介绍“艺术自我评估”的关键,良好实践案例研究,包括皇家歌剧院英国众议院和苏格兰歌剧院以及澳大利亚的马戏团盎司。本文将对案例研究的结果进行分析,并为其他筹资机构应对如何衡量艺术活力的问题提供进一步研究和政策指导的建议。查看全文下载全文关键字艺术评估,澳大利亚,表演艺术, BritainRelated var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2010.515004

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号