...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Culture, Theory and Critique >Sign, Play and Disruption: Derridean Theory and Sign Language
【24h】

Sign, Play and Disruption: Derridean Theory and Sign Language

机译：标志，游戏与破坏：德里达理论与手语

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article explores the relationship between critical theory, specifically Derrida's (199711. Derrida, J. 1997. Of Grammatology Corrected edition. Translated by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University PressView all references) critique of phonocentrism, with the experience of deafness and the status of sign languages. The case is made for an interdisciplinary approach to deafness and Sign that draws on a range of disciplines to reframe deafness in non-essentialised ways. The Derridean concepts of the ‘sign’, ‘play’, ‘differance’ and ‘supplement’ are applied to historical and current understandings of deafness, with particular attention given to educational practices. Derridean theory is used to disrupt assumptions about the status of speech and sign language and to consider how this might change understandings of language and identity. Counterarguments that question the usefulness of Derridean theory are addressed and the implications for social practice are considered. Ultimately, it is argued that Derridean theory can be used to question taken for granted attitudes to language that have led to the discrimination and stigmatisation of deaf people.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2011.621665
机译：本文探讨批判理论之间的关系，特别是德里达（199711.德里达，J。1997.语法修正版。由Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak翻译。巴尔的摩，马里兰州：约翰·霍普金斯大学出版社，查看所有参考文献）对声音中心论的批评，并具有以下经验。耳聋和手语的状态。聋和体征的跨学科研究方法是有道理的，它采用了一系列学科，以非必要的方式重新构造了耳聋。 Derridean的“符号”，“游戏”，“差异”和“补充”概念适用于耳聋的历史和当前理解，尤其是对教育实践的关注。 Derridean理论用于破坏有关语音和手语状态的假设，并考虑这可能会如何改变对语言和身份的理解。解决了质疑德里德里安理论有用性的反驳，并考虑了其对社会实践的影响。最终，有人争论说德里德里安理论可以用来质疑对聋人的歧视和污名化的语言习以为常的态度。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”，services_compact ：：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，美味，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，pubid：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2011.621665

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号