...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Current issues in language planning >Planning sign languages: promoting hearing hegemony? Conceptualizing sign language standardization
【24h】

Planning sign languages: promoting hearing hegemony? Conceptualizing sign language standardization

机译：规划手语：促进听力霸权？概念化手语标准化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In light of the absence of a codified standard variety in British Sign Language and German Sign Language (Deutsche Gebaerdensprache) there have been repeated calls for the standardization of both languages primarily from outside the Deaf community. The paper is based on a recent grounded theory study which explored perspectives on sign language standardization among Deaf sign language teachers in Germany and the UK. The data which were generated over the course of 17 in-depth interviews indicate that participants perceived hearing educators and second language learners as key promoters and beneficiaries of sign language standardization and the very subject matter as posing a potential threat to languages and community. As calls for standardization from hearing people were perceived as a continuation of unequal power relations between Deaf and hearing people fighting over the sign language domain, it will be argued that the subject matter presents a case of 'territorial rivalry'. Consequently, sign language planning initiatives need to be critically examined in the context of potential violation of Deaf community rights.
机译：鉴于在英国手语和德语手语（Deutsche Gebaerdensprache）中没有统一的标准语言版本，人们多次呼吁主要从聋人社区之外来对这两种语言进行标准化。本文基于最近的一项基础理论研究，该研究探讨了德国和英国的聋人手语老师对手语标准化的看法。在17次深度访谈过程中产生的数据表明，参与者认为听力教育者和第二语言学习者是手语标准化的主要推动者和受益者，而这实际上是对语言和社区的潜在威胁。随着人们对听觉标准的呼吁被视为聋人与在手语领域争吵的听觉人之间权力关系不平等的延续，人们会争辩说，该主题代表了“领土对抗”的情况。因此，在可能侵犯聋人社区权利的情况下，必须严格审查手语规划计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号