• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Defence Studies >Beyond the Trinitarian Institutionalization of the Warrior Ethos - A Normative Conceptualization of Soldier and Contractor Commitment in Post-Modern Conflict
【24h】

Beyond the Trinitarian Institutionalization of the Warrior Ethos - A Normative Conceptualization of Soldier and Contractor Commitment in Post-Modern Conflict

机译：超越战士精神的三位一体制度化-后现代冲突中士兵和承包商承诺的规范概念化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Traditionally in liberal normative theory the warrior's ethos has been defined on basis of the warrior's raison d'etre as the trinitarian protector of the social contractari-an discretionary association of society and state. Since the post-modem warrior, whether serving in state uniform or as an employee of a commercial enterprise, is increasingly asked to provide security as a global rather than public good on the liberal state's behalf in non-trinitarian contingency operations, this paper provides a broader normative conceptualization of the post-modem warrior ethos. Trinitarian operations in this respect are defined as those operations that revolve around the state soldier's primary trinitarian function of providing security for society and state as a member of the Clausewitzian trinity of society, state and soldier. Instead of solely conceptualizing the warrior's ethos as a narrow trinitarian institutionalization process, this paper demonstrates that for the warrior who provides security increasingly in non-trinitarian operations, the post-modern warrior ethos becomes more and more an alternatively institutionalized characteristic of spirit beyond the social contractarian trinity. Shaping both the soldier's and the contractor's commitment in non-trinitarian contingency operations, the alternative non-trinitarian institutionalization of the warrior's ethos ensures that the post-modem warrior remains a virtuous and committed security service provider amid high operational risks even when serving the interests of common humanity rather than of his family, state and nation.
机译：传统上，在自由主义规范理论中，根据战士的存在理由将战士的精神定义为社会契约的三位一体的保护者，即社会和国家的自由结合。由于越来越多的要求后现代战士无论是身穿国家制服还是商业企业的雇员，都应在非三位一体的应急行动中代表自由主义国家提供全球性安全，而不是代表自由国提供公共利益，因此本文提供了后现代战士精神的更广泛的规范概念化。在这方面，三位一体的行动被定义为围绕国家士兵作为社会，国家和士兵的克劳塞维兹三位一体的成员为社会和国家提供安全的主要三位一体功能的行动。本文不仅仅将战士的精神概念化为狭义的三位一体的制度化过程，还表明，对于在非三位一体的行动中日益提供安全保障的战士，后现代的战士精神越来越成为一种超越社会的精神的制度化特征。契约三位一体。既体现了士兵和承包商在非三位一体的应急行动中的承诺，对战士的精神的另一种非三位一体的制度化也确保了后现代战士即使在为利益服务者的利益服务时，也面临着高操作风险，仍然是一名良善而坚定的安全服务提供者。普通人类，而不是他的家庭，州和国家。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Defence Studies》 |2014年第1期|56-75|共20页
  • 作者

    ANDREAS KRIEG;

  • 作者单位

    Candidate King's College London War & Defence Studies, Private Military & Security Research Group, Joint Services Command and Staff College, UK Defence Academy;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号