• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Defence Studies >Why they fight? Reconsidering the role of motivation in combat environments
【24h】

Why they fight? Reconsidering the role of motivation in combat environments

机译：为什么他们打架？重新考虑动机在战斗环境中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The current combat motivation model based on primary group thesis assumes that the main force behind motivation is peer-bonding or otherwise known as unit cohesion. Cohesion is perceived as an all-encompassing factor that leads to satisfactory (or unsatisfactory in lack thereof) military effectiveness and performance in conflict environments. However, the article identifies three main problems with this perspective: 1. mono-dimensional view of motivation; 2. motivation based on heteronomy, and 3. self-reporting bias. The current model does not consider motivation as a separate entity from cohesion; it does not place motivation as fundamental human value; lastly, it takes motivation as granted byproduct of socialization. The article proposes a new combat motivation model based on The Self-Determination Theory. The theory maintains that human motivation requires satisfaction of three psychological needs of competence, relatedness, and autonomy. The degree of satisfaction of those three needs leads to different types of regulated motivations - a continuum from intrinsic to extrinsic - each of which has specifiable consequences for learning, performance, and well-being of an individual.
机译：基于主要组论文的当前作战动机模型假设动机背后的主力是对等键合或以其他方式称为单位内聚力。凝聚力被认为是一种全包的因素，导致冲突环境中的军事效率和性能令人满意（或毫无令人满意）。但是，该物品用这种观点来确定三个主要问题：1。动机的单尺寸观点; 2.基于异化的动机，3.自我报告偏见。目前的模型不考虑动力作为来自凝聚力的单独实体;它不会将动力作为基本的人类价值。最后，它将成为社会化副产品的动力。本文提出了一种基于自决理论的新作战动机模型。该理论认为，人类动机需要满足三种能力，相关性和自主性的心理需求。这三种需求的满足程度导致不同类型的受管制动机 - 从内在到外在的连续体 - 每一个对个人的学习，表现和福祉有鉴定后果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号