• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Denver Journal of International Law and Policy >Clarifying the Law Relating to Unmanned Drones and the Use of Force: The Relationships Between Human Rights,Self-Defense, Armed Conflict, and International Humanitarian Law
【24h】

Clarifying the Law Relating to Unmanned Drones and the Use of Force: The Relationships Between Human Rights,Self-Defense, Armed Conflict, and International Humanitarian Law

机译：澄清有关无人机和使用武力的法律：人权，自卫，武装冲突和国际人道主义法之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

As illustrated throughout this article, the law relating to the use of force is complex, contradictory, and highly contentious. Any use of force must fall under one of the three basic legal paradigms: human rights, self-defense, or armed conflict. Due to the lack of a comprehensive definition of terrorism and the failure of the international community to adopt a binding instrument that specifically governs acts of terrorism, States are required to justify their uses of force against terrorists within the three existing bodies of law. Depending upon which legal framework applies, the lethal drone campaigns perpetrated by the U.S. and other States may be legal.
机译：如本文全文所述，与使用武力有关的法律是复杂，矛盾和高度争议的。任何使用武力都必须属于三种基本法律范式之一：人权，自卫或武装冲突。由于缺乏对恐怖主义的全面定义，而且国际社会未能通过专门针对恐怖主义行为的具有约束力的文书，因此，各国必须在现有的三个法律体系中为对恐怖分子使用武力提供辩护。根据适用的法律框架，美国和其他国家实施的致命无人机战役可能是合法的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号