Work with the beat: How dynamic patterns in team processes affect shared understanding

Cash Philip; Dekoninck Elies; Ahmed-Kristensen Saeema

首页> 外文期刊>Design Studies >Work with the beat: How dynamic patterns in team processes affect shared understanding

【24h】

Work with the beat: How dynamic patterns in team processes affect shared understanding

机译：与节拍一起工作：团队流程中的动态模式如何影响共享的理解

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Shared understanding is central to a design team's performance. While current literature describes general relationships between team interaction and the development of shared understanding, it is not known if or how dynamic patterns in team processes impact this. Using a comparative study, we describe dynamic process patterns that influence the relationship between collaborative design work and shared understanding development. We propose two major patterns that impact shared understanding development: taskwork-teamwork interdependency and inter-action heartbeat, and describe how what we term cross-level pattern alignment moderates their effect. We propose a conceptual model that integrates these insights and provides testable propositions. As such, this work has significant implications for both design researchers and practitioners. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

机译：共享理解是设计团队表现的核心。虽然当前的文献描述了团队互动与共享理解的发展之间的一般关系，但它尚不清楚是否或者团队进程中的动态模式如何影响这一点。使用比较研究，我们描述了影响协同设计工作与共享理解发展之间关系的动态过程模式。我们提出了两种主要模式，影响了共享了解发展：任务工作 - 团队合作相互依赖性和行动间心跳，并描述了如何术语跨级别模式对齐效果。我们提出了一个概念模型，整合了这些洞察力并提供了可测量的命题。因此，这项工作对设计研究人员和从业者具有重大影响。（c）2020 elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

来源
《Design Studies》 |2020年第7期|100943.1-100943.39|共39页
作者
Cash Philip; Dekoninck Elies; Ahmed-Kristensen Saeema;
展开▼
作者单位

Tech Univ Denmark DTU Management Lyngby Denmark;

Univ Bath Bath Avon England;

Univ Exeter Business Sch Exeter Devon England;

展开▼
收录信息美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词
design activity; design practice; team processes; shared understanding; communication;

机译：设计活动;设计实践;团队进程;共享理解;沟通;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Interactive affective sharing versus non-interactive affective sharing in work groups: Comparative effects of group affect on work group performance and dynamics [J] . Klep A, Wisse B, Van der Flier H European journal of social psychology . 2011,第3期

机译：工作组中的互动式情感共享与非互动式情感共享：团队情感对工作组绩效和动态的比较影响
2. The ABC of health care team dynamics: Understanding complex affective, behavioral, and cognitive dynamics in interprofessional teams [J] . MitchellR., ParkerV., GilesM., Health care management review . 2014,第1期

机译：保健团队动态的ABC：了解跨专业团队的复杂情感，行为和认知动态
3. Network Structure of Affective Communication and Shared Emotion in Teams [J] . Seung-Yoon Rhee, Hyewon Park, Jonghoon Bae Behavioral Sciences . 2020,第10期

机译：情感通信的网络结构与团队共享情感
4. TEAM COMMUNICATION PATTERNS AS MEASURES OF TEAM PROCESSES: EXPLORING THE EFFECTS OF TASK URGENCY AND SHARED TEAM EXPERIENCE [C] . Yan Xiao, F. Jacob Seagull, Colin Mackenzie, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting . 2003

机译：团队沟通方式作为团队流程的一种手段：探索任务紧迫性和共享团队经验的效果
5. Information processes and shared decision-making: A case study of work teams in a university support service implementing Total Quality Management. [D] . Buchanan, Holly Shipp. 1994

机译：信息流程和共享决策：实施全面质量管理的大学支持服务中的工作团队的案例研究。
6. Network Structure of Affective Communication and Shared Emotion in Teams [O] . Seung-Yoon Rhee, Hyewon Park, Jonghoon Bae 2020

机译：情感通信的网络结构与团队共享情感
7. : "This paper deals with the functionality of the flaked stone assemblages from several Neolithic sites of the NE of the Iberian Peninsula. The chronological framework ranges from the mid-6th to the mid-4th millennium cal. BCE, which corresponds to the Early and Middle Neolithic. This long period ranges from the arrival of the first farming communities in the Iberian Peninsula, around 5600-5500 cal. BCE, to 3600-3500 cal. BCE, two millennia later, when Neolithic communities had stably occupied most of the available territory, from the mountainous areas of the Pyrenees to the coastal areas of the Mediterranean.In this context, the NE of the Iberian Peninsula is one of the areas where a major number of use-wear analyses have been carried out, especially for what concerns the Neolithic period. This is mainly due to the interest shown by the directors of the excavations and by the Spanish use-wear specialists as well; both participated and cooperated in order to enlarge the number of contexts studied, making the NE of the Iberian Peninsula one of the areas of Europe with the largest number of ‘functional studies’. As a result, today we have a reliable picture of the type of lithic tools used by the first farming groups, how they were used, and which needs they were satisfying.The methodology employed for this type of analysis is today broadly shared by most use-wear specialists. A stereoscopic microscope is used together with a reflected-light microscope for the analysis of the archaeological specimens. Afterwards, the observed use-wear traces are compared with the traces from experimental tools. This study primarily made use of the tools preserved at the ‘Traceoteque’ of the Institución Milà y Fontanals of the CSIC of Barcelona.This paper presents the results obtained for the different types of analysed sites and the relative lithic assemblages. In this way, tools from different contexts are compared: open-air sites, caves and rock-shelters, pit-sites, burials, and mining sites. Such a diversity of contexts allowed for the exploration of the existence of recurrences and differences in the functionality of the lithic tools from one site to another. The results obtained have also provided information on some aspects related to the economic processes carried out at the different sites, caves, rock-shelters and open-air contexts. It has been possible to gain fresh data on the types of tasks carried out and their relative importance for each site, their relation with the geographical and environmental context and the natural resources available there. In addition, analysing tools recovered from burials – mainly individual inhumations – provided information on the relationships between the buried individuals and the working tools, in particular exploring the relationships between sex and age patterns and the types of tools deposited as goods.In conclusion, use-wear analysis allowed for the exploration of a variety of issues; from technical aspects related to the production and management of the lithic resources to social aspects related to the subsistence activities and the individuals that carried them out." [O] . Gibaja Bao, Juan Francisco, Mazzucco, Niccolo 2015

机译：：“本文研究了伊比利亚半岛东北部几个新石器时代遗址的片状石材组合的功能。时间框架从公元前6世纪中叶到4世纪中叶，分别对应于早期和早期。新石器时代中期，这段时间的长短是从伊比利亚半岛的第一个农业社区到来，大约在公元前5600-5500 cal，到了两千年后的3600-3500 BCE，当时新石器时代的社区稳定地占据了大部分可用土地。从比利牛斯山脉山区到地中海沿岸地区。在这种情况下，伊比利亚半岛东北部是进行过大量使用磨损分析的地区之一，尤其是在关注方面新石器时代，这主要是由于发掘负责人和西班牙使用服装专家表现出的浓厚兴趣；他们参与和合作以扩大孔蒂的数量xts进行了研究，使伊比利亚半岛的NE成为“功能研究”数量最多的欧洲地区之一。结果，今天我们可以可靠地了解第一批耕作小组使用的石器工具的类型，使用方法以及它们满足的需求。今天，大多数使用方法广泛共享用于这种类型的分析的方法穿专家。立体显微镜与反射光显微镜一起用于分析考古样本。然后，将观察到的使用磨损痕迹与实验工具的痕迹进行比较。这项研究主要利用了巴塞罗那CSIC的米拉·丰塔纳尔研究所的“ Traceoteque”中保存的工具。本文介绍了针对不同类型的分析地点和相对石器组合所获得的结果。通过这种方式，可以比较来自不同环境的工具：露天场所，洞穴和岩石避难所，露天场所，埋葬场所和采矿场所。如此多样的上下文允许探索重复性的存在以及从一个站点到另一个站点的石器工具的功能差异。所获得的结果还提供了与在不同地点，洞穴，避难所和露天环境中进行的经济过程有关的某些方面的信息。可以获得有关所执行任务的类型及其对每个站点的相对重要性，它们与地理和环境环境以及那里可用自然资源的关系的新数据。此外，对从墓葬中回收的工具（主要是个人遗体）进行分析，可提供有关被掩埋的个体与工作工具之间关系的信息，尤其是探索性别与年龄模式之间的关系以及作为商品存放的工具的类型。磨损分析允许探索各种问题；从与石器资源的生产和管理有关的技术方面到与自给活动及其实施者有关的社会方面。”
8. Battle Command Teams' Workload, Situational Understanding, and Shared Mental Models at Unit of Employment, Unit of Action, and Combined Arms Battalion Levels [R] . Sterling, B. S. , Burns, C. A. 2005

机译：战斗指挥小组的工作量，情境理解和就业单位，行动单位和联合军营级别的共享心理模型

Work with the beat: How dynamic patterns in team processes affect shared understanding

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅