...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making >A quantitative analysis of qualitative studies in clinical journals for the 2000 publishing year
【24h】

A quantitative analysis of qualitative studies in clinical journals for the 2000 publishing year

机译：2000出版年度临床期刊定性研究的定量分析

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background Quantitative studies are becoming more recognized as important to understanding health care with all of its richness and complexities. The purpose of this descriptive survey was to provide a quantitative evaluation of the qualitative studies published in 170 core clinical journals for 2000. Methods All identified studies that used qualitative methods were reviewed to ascertain which clinical journals publish qualitative studies and to extract research methods, content (persons and health care issues studied), and whether mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative methods) were used. Results 60 330 articles were reviewed. 355 reports of original qualitative studies and 12 systematic review articles were identified in 48 journals. Most of the journals were in the discipline of nursing. Only 4 of the most highly cited health care journals, based on ISI Science Citation Index (SCI) Impact Factors, published qualitative studies. 37 of the 355 original reports used both qualitative and quantitative (mixed) methods. Patients and non-health care settings were the most common groups of people studied. Diseases and conditions were cancer, mental health, pregnancy and childbirth, and cerebrovascular disease with many other diseases and conditions represented. Phenomenology and grounded theory were commonly used; substantial ethnography was also present. No substantial differences were noted for content or methods when articles published in all disciplines were compared with articles published in nursing titles or when studies with mixed methods were compared with studies that included only qualitative methods. Conclusions The clinical literature includes many qualitative studies although they are often published in nursing journals or journals with low SCI Impact Factor journals. Many qualitative studies incorporate both qualitative and quantitative methods.
机译：背景技术定量研究正变得越来越重要，这对于了解医疗保健的丰富性和复杂性至关重要。这项描述性调查的目的是对2000年在170种核心临床期刊上发表的定性研究进行定量评估。方法对所有使用定性方法的已鉴定研究进行审查，以确定哪些临床期刊发表了定性研究，并提取研究方法，内容（研究人员和医疗保健问题），以及是否使用混合方法（定量和定性方法）。结果审查了60 330篇文章。在48种期刊中鉴定了355份原始定性研究报告和12篇系统评价文章。大多数期刊都属于护理学科。根据ISI科学引文索引（SCI）影响因素，在被引用最多的医疗保健期刊中，只有4种发表了定性研究。 355份原始报告中有37份使用了定性和定量（混合）方法。患者和非保健场所是最常见的人群。疾病和状况包括癌症，精神健康，怀孕和分娩以及脑血管疾病，其中还包括许多其他疾病和状况。现象学和扎根理论被普遍使用。还存在大量的民族志。将所有学科发表的文章与以护理职称发表的文章进行比较，或者将混合方法的研究与仅包含定性方法的研究进行比较时，在内容或方法上都没有发现实质性差异。结论临床文献包括许多定性研究，尽管它们经常发表在护理期刊或SCI影响因子较低的期刊上。许多定性研究都结合了定性和定量方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号