• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Exploring medically-related Canadian summer student research programs: a National Cross-sectional Survey Study
【24h】

Exploring medically-related Canadian summer student research programs: a National Cross-sectional Survey Study

机译：探索与医学相关的加拿大暑期学生研究计划：国家横断面调查研究

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Summer student research programs (SSRPs) serve to generate student interest in research and a clinician-scientist career path. This study sought to understand the composition of existing medically-related Canadian SSRPs, describe the current selection, education and evaluation practices and highlight opportunities for improvement. A cross-sectional survey study among English-language-based medically-related Canadian SSRPs for undergraduate and medical students was conducted. Programs were systematically identified through academic and/or institutional websites. The survey, administered between June–August 2016, collected information on program demographics, competition, selection, student experience, and program self-evaluation. Forty-six of 91 (50.5%) identified programs responded. These SSRPs collectively offered 1842 positions with a mean 3.76 applicants per placement. Most programs (78.3%, n?=?36/46) required students to independently secure a research supervisor. A formal curriculum existed among 61.4% (n?=?27/44) of programs. Few programs (5.9%, n?=?2/34) offered an integrated clinical observership. Regarding evaluation, 11.4% (n?=?5/44) of programs tracked subsequent research productivity and 27.5% (n?=?11/40) conducted long-term impact assessments. Canadian SSRPs are highly competitive with the responsibility of selection primarily with the individual research supervisor rather than a centralized committee. Most programs offered students opportunities to develop both research and communication skills. Presently, the majority of programs do not have a sufficient evaluation component. These findings indicate that SSRPs may benefit from refinement of selection processes and more robust evaluation of their utility. To address this challenge, the authors describe a logic model that provides a set of core outcomes which can be applied as a framework to guide program evaluation of SSRPs.
机译：暑期学生研究计划（SSRP）用于激发学生对研究的兴趣以及临床医生-科学家的职业道路。这项研究旨在了解现有的与医学有关的加拿大SSRP的组成，描述当前的选择，教育和评估实践，并强调改进的机会。进行了一项针对以英语为基础的与医学有关的加拿大SSRP的横断面调查研究，以供本科生和医学生使用。通过学术和/或机构网站系统地确定了程序。该调查于2016年6月至8月进行，收集了有关计划人口统计学，竞赛，选择，学生体验和计划自我评估的信息。 91个确定的计划中有46个（50.5％）做出了回应。这些SSRP总共提供1842个职位，平均每个职位3.76个申请人。大多数课程（78.3％，n = 36/46）要求学生独立聘请研究主管。在61.4％（n？=？27/44）的计划中，存在正规课程。很少有计划（5.9％，n = 2/34）提供综合的临床观察员。关于评估，有11.4％（n？=？5/44）的计划跟踪了后续的研究工作效率，有27.5％（n？=？11/40）进行了长期影响评估。加拿大的SSRP具有很高的竞争力，主要是由个人研究主管而不是中央委员会来进行甄选。大多数课程为学生提供发展研究和沟通技巧的机会。当前，大多数程序都没有足够的评估组件。这些发现表明，SSRP可能会受益于选择过程的完善和对其效用的更可靠评估。为了应对这一挑战，作者描述了一种逻辑模型，该逻辑模型提供了一组核心结果，可以用作指导SSRP计划评估的框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号