• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >The predictive validity of a situational judgement test and multiple-mini interview for entry into postgraduate training in Australia
【24h】

The predictive validity of a situational judgement test and multiple-mini interview for entry into postgraduate training in Australia

机译：情景判断测试和多次迷你面试的预期有效性，以参加澳大利亚的研究生培训

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background Evidence for the predictive validity of situational judgement tests (SJTs) and multiple-mini interviews (MMIs) is well-established in undergraduate selection contexts, however at present there is less evidence to support the validity of their use in postgraduate settings. More research is also required to assess the extent to which SJTs and MMIs are complementary for predicting performance in practice. This study represents the first longitudinal evaluation of the complementary roles and predictive validity of an SJT and an MMI for selection for entry into postgraduate General Practice (GP) specialty training in Australia. Methods Longitudinal data was collected from 443 GP registrars in Australia who were selected into GP training in 2010 or 2011. All 17 Regional Training Providers in Australia were asked to participate; performance data were received from 13 of these. Data was collected for participants’ end-of-training assessment performance. Outcome measures include GP registrars’ performance on the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) applied knowledge test, key feature problems and an objective structured clinical exam. Results Performance on the SJT, MMI and the overall selection score significantly predicted all three end-of-training assessments ( r =?.12 to .54), indicating that both of the selection methods, as well the overall selection score, have good predictive validity. The SJT and MMI provide incremental validity over each other for two of the three end-of-training assessments. Conclusions The SJT and MMI were both significant positive predictors of all end-of-training assessments. Results provide evidence that they are complementary in predicting end-of-training assessment scores. This research adds to the limited literature at present regarding the predictive validity of postgraduate medical selection methods, and their comparable effectiveness when used in a single selection system. A future research agenda is proposed.
机译：背景情况在大学生选择的背景下，情景判断测试（SJT）和多人迷你面试（MMI）的预测有效性的证据已经建立，但是目前尚无证据支持在研究生环境中使用它们的有效性。还需要更多的研究来评估SJT和MMI在实践中预测绩效的互补程度。这项研究代表了对SJT和MMI的补充作用和预测效度进行的首次纵向评估，以供选择进入澳大利亚的研究生一般实践（GP）专业培训。方法：从澳大利亚的443名GP注册服务商中收集纵向数据，这些注册商在2010或2011年被选为GP培训。性能数据是从其中的13个中获得的。收集了有关参与者的培训结束评估绩效的数据。结果措施包括GP注册服务商在澳大利亚皇家全科医生学院（RACGP）应用知识测试，关键特征问题和客观结构化临床考试中的表现。结果在SJT，MMI和总体选择分数上的表现显着预测了所有三个培训结束评估（r =？12至.54），表明这两种选择方法以及总体选择分数都很好预测效度。对于三个训练结束评估中的两个，SJT和MMI相互之间提供递增的有效性。结论SJT和MMI都是所有训练结束评估的重要阳性预测指标。结果提供了证据，表明它们在预测培训结束时的评估分数方面是互补的。这项研究增加了当前有关研究生医学选择方法的预测有效性及其在单个选择系统中使用时的可比有效性的有限文献。提出了未来的研究议程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号