• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Accreditation council for graduate medical education (ACGME) annual anesthesiology residency and fellowship program review: a
【24h】

Accreditation council for graduate medical education (ACGME) annual anesthesiology residency and fellowship program review: a

机译：研究生医学教育认证委员会（ACGME）年度麻醉学住院医师和研究金计划审查：

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires an annual evaluation of all ACGME-accredited residency and fellowship programs to assess program quality. The results of this evaluation must be used to improve the program. This manuscript describes a metric to be used in conducting ACGME-mandated annual program review of ACGME-accredited anesthesiology residencies and fellowships. Methods A variety of metrics to assess anesthesiology residency and fellowship programs are identified by the authors through literature review and considered for use in constructing a program "report card." Results Metrics used to assess program quality include success in achieving American Board of Anesthesiology (ABA) certification, performance on the annual ABA/American Society of Anesthesiology In-Training Examination, performance on mock oral ABA certification examinations, trainee scholarly activities (publications and presentations), accreditation site visit and internal review results, ACGME and alumni survey results, National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) results, exit interview feedback, diversity data and extensive program/rotation/faculty/curriculum evaluations by trainees and faculty. The results are used to construct a "report card" that provides a high-level review of program performance and can be used in a continuous quality improvement process. Conclusions An annual program review is required to assess all ACGME-accredited residency and fellowship programs to monitor and improve program quality. We describe an annual review process based on metrics that can be used to focus attention on areas for improvement and track program performance year-to-year. A "report card" format is described as a high-level tool to track educational outcomes.
机译：背景研究生医学教育认证委员会（ACGME）要求对所有经过ACGME认证的住院医师和研究金计划进行年度评估，以评估计划质量。评估结果必须用于改进程序。该手稿描述了一种指标，用于对ACGME认可的麻醉学住院医师和研究金进行ACGME强制性年度计划审核。方法作者通过文献综述确定了各种评估麻醉学住院医师和研究金计划的指标，并考虑将其用于构建计划“报告卡”。结果用于评估计划质量的指标包括成功获得美国麻醉学委员会（ABA）认证，在ABA /美国麻醉学学会年度训练中的表现，模拟口头ABA认证考试的表现，受训者的学术活动（出版物和演讲） ），认证现场访问和内部审查结果，ACGME和校友调查结果，国家居民匹配计划（NRMP）结果，退出面试反馈，多样性数据以及受训人员和教职员工进行的广泛的计划/轮换/教师/课程评估。结果将用于构建“报告卡”，该报告卡可对程序性能进行高层评估，并可用于持续的质量改进过程中。结论需要进行年度计划审核，以评估所有ACGME认可的居留和研究金计划，以监控和改善计划质量。我们根据度量标准描述了年度审核过程，该过程可用于将注意力集中在需要改进的地方并逐年跟踪计划的绩效。 “成绩单”格式被描述为跟踪教育成果的高级工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号