...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth >Accuracy of immediate antepartum ultrasound estimated fetal weight and its impact on mode of delivery and outcome - a cohort analysis
【24h】

Accuracy of immediate antepartum ultrasound estimated fetal weight and its impact on mode of delivery and outcome - a cohort analysis

机译:立即产前超声估计胎儿体重的准确性及其对分娩方式和结局的影响-队列分析

获取原文
           

摘要

The aim of the study was to investigate the accuracy of ultrasound-derived estimated fetal weight (EFW) and to determine its impact on management and outcome of delivery. In this single-center cohort analysis, women with a singleton term pregnancy in the beginning stages of labor were included. Women with immediately antepartum EFW (N?=?492) were compared to women without ultrasound (N?=?515). EFW was correct (deviation from birth weight?≤?10%) in 72.2% (355/492) of patients with fetal biometry; 19.7% (97/492) were underestimated, and 8.1% (40/492) were overestimated. Newborns with a lower birth weight were more frequently overestimated, and newborns with higher birth weight were more frequently underestimated. The mean difference between EFW and real birth weight was ??114.5?g (standard deviation ±313?g, 95% confidence interval 87.1–142.0). The rate of non-reassuring fetal heart tracing (9.8% vs. 1.9%, P?
机译:这项研究的目的是调查超声估计胎儿体重(EFW)的准确性,并确定其对管理和分娩结果的影响。在此单中心队列分析中,包括了分娩初期单胎妊娠的妇女。将具有立即产前EFW的女性(N?=?492)与没有超声的女性(N?=?515)进行比较。 72.2%(355/492)的胎儿生物学检查患者的EFW是正确的(偏离出生体重?≤?10%);低估了19.7%(97/492),而高估了8.1%(40/492)。出生体重较低的新生儿经常被高估,而出生体重较高的新生儿则经常被低估。 EFW与实际出生体重之间的平均差为?? 114.5?g(标准偏差±313?g,95%置信区间87.1–142.0)。在EFW患者中,无法放心的胎儿心脏追踪率(9.8%比1.9%,P 0.001)和剖腹产率(9.1%比5.0%,P <= 0.013)更高。高估会增加剖腹产的风险(赔率2.80; 95%置信区间1.2–6.5,P = 0.017)。调整后,EFW仍与增加的令人不安的胎儿心脏追踪(奇数比4.73; 95%置信区间2.3-9.6)和剖腹产相关(奇数比1.86; 95%置信区间1.1-3.1)相关。两组的会阴部流泪3/4级,肩难产,产后抑郁和新生儿酸中毒的发生率在两组之间没有差异。产前超声检查得出的EFW不能改善母体和胎儿的预后,因此不建议使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号