首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine >Predicting Community Emergency Medicine Needs and Emergency Physician Compensation Modeling; Two Sides of the Same Coin?
【24h】

Predicting Community Emergency Medicine Needs and Emergency Physician Compensation Modeling; Two Sides of the Same Coin?

机译:预测社区急诊医学需求和急诊医师补偿模型;同一枚硬币的两面?

获取原文
           

摘要

To the editor: Dubinsky’s broadoverview of emergency physician(EP) ‘‘workload’’ models1 has important implications to populationhealth outcomes and national physician resource planning. It seemsthat this is a complex issue and thatthere is ‘‘no perfect single existingmodel.’’ I wonder, however, whetherthis article adequately differentiatesbetween 1) matching emergency medicine capacity with patient/populationneeds and 2) modeling workload forthe purposes of fair compensation.Practically, they may be two sides ofthe same coin, but conflating thesetwo perspectives risks creating conflicting priorities. As Einstein has said,‘‘Formulating the problem is moreessential than the solutions.’’
机译:致编辑:杜宾斯基(Dubinsky)对急诊医师(EP)“工作量”模型的广泛概述1对人口健康结果和国家医师资源规划具有重要意义。看来这是一个复杂的问题,并且“没有完美的单一现有模型”。但是,我想知道本文是否在以下方面进行了充分区分:1)将紧急医疗能力与患者/人群需求相匹配;以及2)为公平补偿而建模的工作量。 ,它们可能是同一枚硬币的两个方面,但是将这两个观点混为一谈可能会产生相互冲突的优先级。正如爱因斯坦所说:“解决问题比解决方案更重要。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号