• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Research >Communication between Patients and Nurses, Midwives and Doctors Using Focus Group Discussions
【24h】

Communication between Patients and Nurses, Midwives and Doctors Using Focus Group Discussions

机译：患者和护士，助产士和医生之间使用焦点小组讨论进行的沟通

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background: In the everyday understanding of communication between patients and health professionals, emphasis should be on effective communication in providing effective health care. This, therefore, leads to a special relationship in the health setting. The nature of the relationship depends on how the two parties understand the communication sequence.?Communication skills training has been found to improve doctor-patient communication. Some methods used in studying doctor-patient communication are self-report measures, interviews, observational studies, randomised controlled studies, and focus group discussions. Researchers have defined focus group discussions (FGDs) as a procedure used in gathering data moderated by a researcher, and it is usually focused on ideas, knowledge, and thinking of participants. In Ghana, nurses, midwives, and doctors do not provide information to patients on their diseases. Therefore, the objective of this study was to explore Tamale Teaching Hospital nurses, midwives, and doctors’ descriptions of the information needs of Tamale Teaching Hospital patients. Methods: The design was semi-structured discussions with three groups. A convenient sample of doctors and a random sample of nurses and midwives from Tamale Teaching Hospital were participants. The researcher (MA) developed questions, which were used in stimulating the focus group discussions. MA facilitated the discussions and the research assistant (AAM) took notes and did the tape recording. To ensure reliable results, there was involvement of colleagues who had good knowledge of FG methods and participants for their viewpoints and confirmation. Excel database was used in the compilation, analyses, and syntheses. Data were collected in May 2013. Results: The results of the FG discussion showed that the nameature of proposed treatment, the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed treatment, alternative treatment procedures, advantages and disadvantages of alternative treatment were of concern to patients and needs special attention. Conclusions: These findings are consistent with earlier studies that patients were not given adequate information on their diseases. The findings from this study showed that patients in Tamale Teaching Hospital need a lot more information on their treatment.
机译：背景：在对患者与卫生专业人员之间沟通的日常理解中，应强调在提供有效医疗保健方面的有效沟通。因此，这导致健康状况中的特殊关系。关系的性质取决于双方如何理解交流顺序。已发现交流技能培训可以改善医患沟通。研究医患沟通的一些方法是自我报告测量，访谈，观察性研究，随机对照研究和焦点小组讨论。研究人员已将焦点小组讨论（FGD）定义为一种用于收集研究人员主持的数据的过程，并且通常集中在想法，知识和参与者的思维上。在加纳，护士，助产士和医生不会向患者提供有关其疾病的信息。因此，本研究的目的是探讨Tamale教学医院护士，助产士和医生对Tamale教学医院患者的信息需求的描述。方法：设计是与三个小组进行的半结构化讨论。参加者包括来自Tamale教学医院的方便医生样本以及随机的护士和助产士样本。研究人员（MA）提出了一些问题，这些问题被用来激发焦点小组的讨论。 MA促进了讨论，研究助理（AAM）做了笔记并进行了录音。为了确保可靠的结果，有一些熟悉FG方法的同事的参与和参与者的观点和确认。 Excel数据库用于编译，分析和综合。 2013年5月收集了数据。结果：FG讨论的结果表明，所提议的治疗方法的名称/性质，所提议的治疗方法的优缺点，替代治疗程序，替代治疗的优缺点均受到患者和患者的关注。需要特别注意。结论：这些发现与早期研究一致，即患者没有得到有关其疾病的足够信息。这项研究的结果表明，塔马利教学医院的患者需要更多有关其治疗的信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号