...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of psychiatry >Alternatives to use of restraint: A path toward humanistic care
【24h】

Alternatives to use of restraint: A path toward humanistic care

机译：使用约束的替代方法：通往人文关怀的道路

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Restraint and seclusion are measures to restrict the movement of a person. The predominant reason cited for the use of restraint in mental health settings is the safety of the staff and the patient in times of aggression and to control problem behaviors. However, there have been significant issues in terms of ethics, rights of the patient, and the harmful effects of restraint. Recently, there has been a move in Western countries to decrease its use by incorporating alternative methods and approaches. In India, the Mental Healthcare Act of 2017 advocates the use of least restrictive measures and alternatives to restraint in providing care and treatment for person with mental illness. In this context, approach to restraints is all the more relevant. This article looks to overview the types of restraints, complications of restraints, and the alternatives to restraint in diverse settings.
机译：克制和隔离是限制人员活动的措施。在精神卫生环境中使用约束的主要原因是在发生侵略时人员和患者的安全以及控制问题行为的安全性。但是，在道德，患者权利以及约束的有害影响方面存在重大问题。最近，西方国家已采取措施，通过采用替代方法和方法来减少其使用。在印度，2017年《精神保健法》提倡在为精神疾病患者提供护理和治疗时采用限制性最小的措施和替代措施。在这种情况下，采取约束措施就显得尤为重要。本文旨在概述约束的类型，约束的复杂性以及在各种情况下约束的替代方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号