• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Insights >Co-operating for gold open access without APCs
【24h】

Co-operating for gold open access without APCs

机译：在没有APC的情况下合作进行黄金开放访问

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

While article processing charges (APCs) are emerging as a key way in which existing publishers can adapt to gold open access (OA), this mode is problematic in many ways. Considering the existing subscription publication ecosystem as a risk/cost-pooling mechanism leads to the conclusion that APCs are a concentration of risk that may come with damaging institutional consequences, particularly in the humanities disciplines. Consortial and co-operative modes of funding gold OA, however, do not come with these drawbacks but are susceptible to ‘free riders’. In this article, the theoretical backdrop to these models is addressed and the range of current offerings evaluated. Noting that classical economic incentives do not seem to operate in a world of inter-library loans, the article ends with a description of the model that is being implemented for the Open Library of Humanities initiative, funded by the Andrew W Mellon Foundation.
机译：虽然文章处理费（APC）逐渐成为现有发布者可以适应黄金开放获取（OA）的一种关键方式，但这种方式在许多方面都存在问题。将现有的订阅出版物生态系统视为一种风险/成本分担机制，得出的结论是，APC是一种风险的集中点，可能会带来破坏性的机构后果，尤其是人文学科。但是，按金和合作模式为黄金OA筹集资金并没有这些缺点，但容易受到“搭便车者”的影响。本文讨论了这些模型的理论背景，并评估了当前产品的范围。注意到古典经济激励措施似乎在图书馆间借贷的世界中并不起作用，本文结尾处描述了由安德鲁·W·梅隆基金会资助的“开放人文图书馆”计划正在实施的模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号