• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences >The Debate of Minimizing Subjectivity in Gender Studies: A Critical Analysis
【24h】

The Debate of Minimizing Subjectivity in Gender Studies: A Critical Analysis

机译：性别研究中关于减少主体性的争论：批判性分析

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The social sciences have always been contested on the philosophical and ethical grounds of producing scientific knowledge. Similarly, the standpoints of Gender studies are analytically linked to certain domains of reasoning for human behavior. It discusses social phenomena from a societal and cultural perspective, which raises questions for the scholars of this subject about the application of particular procedures for understanding realities guided by some ideologies (S?derlund & Madison, 2017). This article critically evaluates the theoretical debate on ways of upholding the objectivity in this discipline by minimizing the role of subjectivity in the construction of new knowledge. It is concluded that by adopting techniques such as bracketing, triangulation, reflexivity and various other theoretical stands mentioned by scholars, feminists, and social scientists, the struggle of producing objective systematic knowledge can be promoted in gender studies and other social sciences.
机译：社会科学历来都是在产生科学知识的哲学和伦理基础上受到争议的。同样，性别研究的观点在分析上与人类行为推理的某些领域联系在一起。它从社会和文化的角度讨论了社会现象，这为该学科的学者提出了一些问题，即如何应用特定程序来理解某些意识形态所指导的现实（S？derlund＆Madison，2017）。本文通过最大限度地减少主观性在新知识构建中的作用，来批判性地评价有关在该学科中坚持客观性的方法的理论辩论。结论是，通过采用学者，女权主义者和社会科学家提到的方括号，三角剖分，反身性和其他各种理论立场等技术，可以在性别研究和其他社会科学中促进产生客观系统知识的斗争。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号