• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences >The Dialogic Turn: Dialogue or Violence?
【24h】

The Dialogic Turn: Dialogue or Violence?

机译：对话转向：对话还是暴力？

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Individuals and social groups are increasingly using dialogue to take decisions, perform actions and solve conflicts in diverse social relationships, from international policies or globalization processes to personal friendships, labor relations or the intimacy of bedroom. When they do not use dialogue, they use violence or imposition: there are only two ways to proceed. The increase of dialogue does not imply that there is no violence in human and social relationships, obviously there is; but this phenomenon confirms that there exist many dialogic interactions and procedures in society which shed light to the process of radicalization of democracy, and thus need to be further analyzed from the social sciences. This article does so; it discusses the “dialogic turn” in the social sciences and illustrates it with the case of feminist theory and practice. Whereas in the past feminism had been a movement for few academic women often speaking for “others”, current dialogic feminism brings into egalitarian dialogue the voices of very diverse women who reach agreements regarding vision and action.?
机译：从国际政策或全球化进程到个人友谊，劳资关系或卧室的亲密关系，个人和社会团体越来越多地使用对话来决策，采取行动并解决各种社会关系中的冲突。当他们不使用对话时，他们会使用暴力或强加手段：只有两种方式可以进行。对话的增加并不意味着人类和社会关系中没有暴力，显然存在暴力。但是这种现象证实了社会中存在着许多对话互动和程序，这为民主的激进化进程提供了启示，因此需要从社会科学中进行进一步的分析。本文是这样做的;它讨论了社会科学中的“对话转向”，并以女权主义理论和实践为例进行了说明。过去，女权主义是为数不多的经常以“其他人”代言的学术女性的运动，而目前的对话女权主义却在平等对话中引起了在观点和行动上达成共识的多种多样女性的声音。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号