首页> 外文期刊>International journal for equity in health >The applicability of measures of socioeconomic position to different ethnic groups within the UK
【24h】

The applicability of measures of socioeconomic position to different ethnic groups within the UK

机译:社会经济地位衡量指标对英国不同种族群体的适用性

获取原文
           

摘要

Background In this paper we seek to tease out differences in socioeconomic position between ethnic groups. There are 3 main reasons why conventional socioeconomic indicators and asset based measures may not be equally applicable to all ethnic groups: 1) Differences in response rate to conventional socioeconomic indicators 2) Cultural and social differences in economic priorities/opportunities 3) Differences in housing quality, assets and debt within socioeconomic strata Methods The sample consisted of White (n = 227), African-Caribbean (n = 213) and Indian and Pakistani (n = 233) adults aged between 18 and 59 years living in Leeds as measured in a stratified population survey. Measures included income, education, employment, car ownership, home ownership, housing quality, household assets, investments, debt, perceived ability to obtain various sums and perceived level of financial support given and received. Results Response rates to education and income questions were similar for the different ethnic groups. Overall response rates for income were much lower than those for education and biased towards wealthier people. There were differences between ethnic groups in economic priorities/opportunities particularly in relation to car ownership, home ownership, investment and debt. Differences in living conditions, household assets and debt between ethnic groups were dependent on differences in education; however differences in car ownership, home ownership, ability to obtain £10 000, and loaning money to family/friends and income from employment/self employment persisted after adjustment for education. Conclusion In the UK, education appears to be an effective variable for measuring variation in SEP across ethnic groups but the ability to account for SEP differences may be improved by the addition of car and home ownership, ability to obtain £10 000, loaning money to family/friends and income from employment/self employment. Further research is required to establish the degree to which results of this study are generalisable.
机译:背景资料在本文中,我们试图找出不同种族之间社会经济地位的差异。常规社会经济指标和基于资产的措施可能无法平等地适用于所有种族的主要原因有3个:1)对常规社会经济指标的回应率差异2)经济优先事项/机遇的文化和社会差异3)住房质量差异社会经济阶层中的资产,资产和债务方法样本包括白人(n = 227),非洲加勒比海地区(n = 213)以及印度和巴基斯坦(n = 233)年龄在18至59岁的利兹成年人,分别在利兹市进行测量。分层人口调查。衡量标准包括收入,教育,就业,汽车所有权,房屋所有权,住房质量,家庭资产,投资,债务,获得各种款项的感知能力以及所给予和接受的财政支持的感知水平。结果不同种族对教育和收入问题的回答率相似。收入的总体回应率远低于教育的回应率,并且偏向富裕人群。族裔群体在经济优先事项/机会方面存在差异,特别是在汽车拥有,住房拥有,投资和债务方面。族裔之间的生活条件,家庭资产和债务的差异取决于教育的差异;但是,在调整了教育之后,汽车所有权,房屋所有权,获得£ 10,000的能力以及向家人/朋友借钱以及就业/自雇的收入之间的差异仍然存在。结论在英国,教育似乎是衡量不同种族之间SEP差异的有效变量,但是通过增加购车和购房,获得10000英镑的能力,向银行贷款的能力,可以提高解决SEP差异的能力。家庭/朋友和从业/自雇的收入。需要进一步的研究以确定该研究结果可推广的程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号